Deathallo

AGS Light Ghost Coming soon.

4 hours ago | [YT] | 17

Deathallo

T-34 Prototype World War II Stories Part3!

The Flawed Reality of the Early T-34:
While the early T-34 was a mechanical marvel, its initial deployment in 1941 was often chaotic. The early T-34 Prototype or T-34 1940 was a technological marvel hindered by its rushed production. While its sloped armor and diesel engine were revolutionary, it suffered from severe ergonomics, transmission failures, and a cramped two-man turret that severely limited combat effectiveness. effectiveness. The T-34 was forged in an age of emergency, forcing designers to prioritize mass production and sheer numbers over refinement. The reality of its early flaws includes.

Logistical Nightmares:
Because the tanks were rushed into battle, many crews lacked proper training. In the summer of 1941, nearly 50% of early T-34 losses were due to mechanical breakdowns, poor logistics, and running out of fuel, rather than enemy fire.
Tactical Disorganization:
Early prototypes and models initially lacked armor-piercing ammunition. Despite the technological superiority of the vehicle itself, uncoordinated Red Army tactics often led to early tactical losses against superior German training and combined-arms doctrines.

The Two Man Turret:
The early iterations featured a small turret where the commander also had to act as the gunner. This arrangement proved ineffective and highly overworked the commander, greatly diminishing combat efficiency.
Mechanical and Gearbox Failures:
The early models utilized transmissions with a high failure rate because they lacked synchronized gearing and were too weak for the vehicle's weight.
Ergonomics and Vision:
The interior was cramped, visibility was universally poor for the crew, and the loader struggled with the lack of a turret basket.
Lack of Radios:
Most early tanks were not equipped with radios, forcing commanders to communicate via flags, with only lead tanks fitted with transmitting capabilities.
Armor and Build Quality:
Because of a severe rubber shortage and the need to expedite production in newly evacuated factories, build standards slipped, leading to leaky hulls, poor air filtration, and sometimes even brittle steel that could shatter under fire.

5 hours ago | [YT] | 8

Deathallo

T-34 Prototype World War II Stories Part2!

The 1941 Monster Of the Eastern Front:
The First Encounter:
When Germany launched Operation Barbarossa in June 1941, roughly 1,000 early-production T-34s were stationed at the border. The Nazi forces were completely unprepared, having never encountered a tank with heavy, sloped armor and a devastating 76.2mm main gun.

The Invincible Tank:
One famous tactical report details an early T-34 encountering two German Panzer Ils. The T-34 reportedly took at least six direct hits that bounced off like a drumroll, destroyed both Panzers, and carved a nine mile path of destruction through German lines before finally being stopped by a point-blank howitzer blast.

Armor Defiance:
Anti tank guns like the German 37mm nicknamed the Door Knocker were utterly useless against the sloped frontal hull, forcing German crews to scramble to find 88mm anti-aircraft guns to neutralize the threat.

The T-34 Prototype known during development as the A-34 was the precursor to the legendary Soviet medium tank that shocked German forces during the 1941 invasion of the USSR. Combining formidable sloping armor, excellent mobility, and a powerful 76.2mm cannon, it became the backbone of the Red Army. The T-34 concept was developed from 1937 to 1939 by designer Mikhail Koshkin at the Kharkiv Factory No. 183. The initial A-34 prototype was born out of a desire for a heavily armored, fast-moving vehicle that could operate effectively across the challenging terrain of the Eastern Front.

Sloped Armor:
Pioneered sloped armor concepts, featuring 45mm thick, 60 degree angled frontal armor that caused German anti tank rounds to easily bounce off.
Firepower:
Armed with the 76.2mm L-11 cannon later replaced by the F-34, which easily outmatched the lighter, shorter guns on early German Panzer Ill and IV tanks.
Mobility:
Utilized the Christie suspension system adapted from American engineer J. Walter Christie's designs, which allowed for exceptional off-road speed and handling.
Engine:
Powered by the innovative 500 hp V-2-34 diesel engine, which gave the tank good speed and a lower risk of fire than its gasoline-powered counterparts.

The 1941 Battlefield Impact:
When the Germans launched Operation Barbarossa in June 1941, the appearance of early T-34s completely shocked them. German General Ewald von Kleist famously described encountering the T-34 as being approached by a prehistoric monster, as German antitank guns proved largely ineffective against it. Despite its revolutionary design, the early prototype was not perfect. Early models suffered from a cramped two man turret meaning the commander also had to act as the gunner and a notoriously unreliable transmission. Nevertheless, its rugged simplicity, ease of mass production, and overall combat effectiveness permanently changed armored warfare worldwide.

6 hours ago | [YT] | 11

Deathallo

T-34 Prototype World War II Stories Part1!
The primary battle stories of the T-34
prototypes revolve around their dramatic 1940 proving runs and their legendary, shocking combat debut against the invading German Wehrmacht in the summer of 1941. The true prototype predecessors to the iconic T-34 were known as the A-20 and the heavier A-32. The ultimate battle these early vehicles faced was a proving ground trial against both nature and military bureaucracy to secure their existence.

The Secret 1,200-Mile Marathon Spring 1940:
The Mission:
Before it was mass-produced, chief designer Mikhail Koshkin had to prove his A-34 prototype which was to become the T-34 was durable enough for warfare.
The Journey:
In March 1940, two prototype T-34s secretly drove 1,200 miles over 2,000 kilometers from the Kharkov Locomotive Plant in Ukraine, through harsh winter conditions and deep snow, all the way to Moscow and back.
The Outcome:
After demonstrating the tank to the Kremlin and Joseph Stalin, the prototypes were driven back. The brutal journey tested the drivetrain and suspension, leading to vital tweaks. Tragically, Koshkin contracted pneumonia during this freezing trek and died later that year before seeing his tank dominate the frontlines.

The famous 1,200-mile 2,000-kilometer spring marathon in 1940 was a covert test of two early
T-34 prototypes to prove their mechanical durability and road-worthiness to Soviet military leadership. This grueling journey successfully secured mass production of the revolutionary tank. In March 1940, chief designer Mikhail Koshkin and his engineering team at Kharkov Factory No. 183 were under immense pressure. The military demanded that the new prototypes undergo a strict 1,200-mile endurance test. Instead of driving in circles around the factory, Koshkin devised a daring plan: drive the T-34 prototypes directly to the Kremlin in Moscow for Stalin's approval.

The Route and Objectives:
Departure:
The journey began in Kharkov Ukraine on March 17, 1940.
The Route:
The tanks secretly navigated snow-covered back roads and avoided major cities. They traveled through Tula and arrived in Moscow to be displayed in the Kremlin's Ivanovskaya Square on March 30, 1940.
The Return:
After a successful demonstration which included tests against the Mannerheim Line in Finland, the prototypes were driven back to Kharkov via Minsk and Kiev.

The Aftermath and Legacy:
Political Approval:
Stalin and Soviet leadership were highly impressed by the T-34's advanced sloped armor, diesel engine, and high-speed mobility. Serial production was officially authorized immediately after the demonstration.
Tragic Cost:
The journey took a severe toll on the designers.
During the return leg, Mikhail Koshkin contracted pneumonia from the harsh travel conditions. He passed away in September 1940, never seeing how legendary his creation would become.

18 hours ago | [YT] | 26

Deathallo

I have obtained the Gepard 1A2.

19 hours ago | [YT] | 24

Deathallo

T-28/T-28E World War II Battle Stories Part4!

The Prototype T-28E with F-30:
The Forgotten Prototype:
A rare, up-gunned variant of the T-28E featured a massive 85mm F-30 cannon. Only a single prototype was constructed and trialed in 1941, and historical records do not indicate it ever seeing active combat. The T-28E with F-30 is a rare Soviet Tier IV premium medium tank in World of Tanks. Based on a 1941 prototype, it mounts a massive 85mm F-30 cannon on a heavily up-armored T-28 chassis, creating a slow but hard-hitting mini KV-2 that dishes out devastating alpha damage.

The Historical Prototype:
Historically, the standard T-28 was an innovative but thinly armored multi-turreted medium tank. In 1941, as the Soviets desperately needed to up-gun their armored forces, a single prototype was built outfitting the T-28 with the much larger 85mm F-30 gun. The trials proved that bolting this heavy, high caliber artillery piece onto the older, lighter chassis caused immense strain on the suspension and transmission. Because the chassis was already becoming obsolete and the design proved impractical to maintain, it never entered mass production.

The In Game Legend:
The Boomstick:
The 85mm F-30 gun is the tank's defining trait, With 120mm of standard penetration and a meaty 160 alpha damage, it can rip through equal and lower-tier opponents in just a couple of shots.
The Armor: The 'E' stands for ekranami with screens/appliqué armor. Unlike the standard T-28, which is notoriously fragile, this version features up to 50mm of frontal hull armor, allowing it to shrug off shots that would normally destroy standard medium tanks.
The Trade-Offs:
To carry such a heavy gun and thick armor, the tank sacrifices mobility. It is significantly slower than the standard T-28, has a long aim time 3.2 seconds, and features poor gun depression, meaning players must play patiently.
The Bizarre Crew:
One of the most famous quirks among veteran players is the crew layout. It has an unusual 6 man crew setup which requires two radio operators-forcing commanders to scrounge for extra crew members to avoid penalty.

21 hours ago | [YT] | 4

Deathallo

T-28/T-28E World War II Battle Stories Part3!

Captured Service The Finnish Continuation War 1941-1944:
During the Continuation War 1941-1944, the Finnish Army heavily relied on captured enemy armor to bolster its armored forces. The Soviet T-28E a multi-turreted medium tank fitted with applique armor was one of the most formidable, albeit challenging, war prizes pressed into service against its creators.

Captured Tanks:
Finnish forces captured seven T-28 series tanks during the conflict. Because the Finns lacked heavy tractors, many captured tanks were stripped of their machine guns, radios, and components, then left behind.

Rebirth in the Winter Platoon:
Despite this, the Finns managed to repair and field captured T-28s in a specialized Heavy Tank Platoon. This unit first saw combat on September 4, 1941, during the battles near the village of Tuullos.

Evolution:
By the time the Panssaridivisioona Finnish Armored Division was formed, the platoon was expanded into a Heavy Tank Company, continuing service with Finnish markings.

Total Captured:
Out of seven T-28s taken throughout the Winter War and Continuation War, only one was an original factory up-armored T-28E model. The Finns subsequently upgraded the rest of their fleet to the E-standard.

Unit Assignment:
Captured T-28s formed the backbone of the Heavy Tank Platoon, which was eventually expanded into the Heavy Tank Company. They were later split among the 3rd Tank Company and 6th Tank Company within the Armored Brigade Panssariprikaati.

Tactical Role:
Originally designed for infantry support, these tanks were affectionately and mockingly nicknamed
Postivaunu The Mail Coach by Finnish troops, partly due to the capture of one carrying Soviet mail and partly due to its long, train like appearance.

Strengths:
The T-28E possessed heavy firepower for its time, featuring a 76.2mm main gun and several machine guns to suppress enemy infantry. The applique armor also offered much needed protection against early anti tank rifles and light artillery.

Weaknesses:
Mechanically, the tank was incredibly complex and suffered from poor reliability. The engine required a complete overhaul after just 150 hours of use. Because the tank was massive and slow, it frequently drew heavy return fire, gaining a reputation among crews as an anti tank gun magnet.

Fate of the Tanks:
Due to poor mechanical reliability and the rapid advancement of armored warfare, the T-28 was largely replaced by lighter or more modern vehicles later in the war. Several remaining tanks were relegated to static defense or used primarily for spare parts to keep other captured armor operational.

21 hours ago | [YT] | 7

Deathallo

T-28/T-28E World War II Battle Stories Part2!

Operation Barbarossa 1941:
In June 1941, the Red Army deployed over 400 T-28 medium tanks, including up-armored T-28E variants, during the opening days of Operation Barbarossa. Though obsolete and prone to mechanical breakdowns, these multi-turreted behemoths participated in desperate counterattacks and urban defense operations.

Defense of the Soviet Border:
When the German invasion began, the Red Army had roughly 411 T-28 and T-28E tanks on the western frontier.
Logistical Nightmares:
Many of these tanks did not survive the opening months of the war. A significant number were lost not to enemy fire, but to mechanical breakdowns and a severe lack of spare parts, which forced crews to abandon otherwise intact machines.
Urban Defense:
The survivors of the initial onslaught were subsequently thrown into the desperate defense of Moscow and Leningrad before being declared obsolete and phased out.

The Minsk Breakout June 1941:
Cut off in occupied Minsk, a lone T-28 crew led by Major Vasechkin and Sergeant Malko launched a desperate breakout. The tank smashed through a dammed column of German trucks and slashed into a nearby park. The crew then engaged and crushed a column of unsuspecting Wehrmacht motorcyclists on Lenin Street before escaping.

The Battle of Dubno Brody June 1941:
The T-28 fought in the massive armored clashes of Dubno and Brody in Western Ukraine. Due to the sudden German invasion and Soviet disorganization, many of these vehicles were forced into the fight straight from repair depots and were subsequently lost to German air superiority and anti-tank fire.

The Defense of Moscow December 1941:
As German forces pushed to the outskirts of the capital, the remaining battered T-28s were pulled back. Due to their extremely low mobility and heavy weight, the Red Army utilized these surviving machines as static artillery batteries to support infantry regiments.

22 hours ago | [YT] | 5

Deathallo

T-28/T-28E World War II Battle Stories Part1!

The Winter War 1939-1940:
The T-28E from the Russian ekranirovannij or
shielded was a Soviet multi turreted medium tank born out of bitter combat experience. Designed to break through fortified positions, its original thin armor proved inadequate against Finnish anti-tank weapons during the Winter War. To counter this, appliqué armor plates 30-50mm thick were welded to the hull and turrets, bringing the tank's weight to 32 tons.

The Mannerheim Line:
Early iterations of the T-28 were primarily used in direct assaults on Finnish pillboxes and fortified defensive lines.
The Shielded Response:
Because the initial 30mm of armor was too thin against Finnish anti-tank defenses, roughly 111 T-28 tanks were modified with additional add-on armor creating the T-28E to break through the heavily fortified Mannerheim Line.
Battle Statistics:
Over the course of the campaign, around 200 T-28s were knocked out, but due to Soviet salvage operations, only about 20 were permanently lost.

The Mail Express Discovery January 1940:
During ambushes around the Summa sector, Finnish forces successfully knocked out several T-28 tanks. Upon inspecting one of the destroyed hulks, Finnish scouts found the turret completely packed full of undelivered mail, resulting in the famous Finnish nickname Postijuna The Mail Express or Mail Coach.
Creation of the T-28E Variant:
The initial performance of the T-28 was dismal due to Finnish anti-tank guns and improvised Molotov Cocktails. In response, Joseph Stalin's forces quickly developed the T-28E, bolting on appliqué armor that increased frontal thickness from 30 mm to a massive 80mm to survive the punishing winter combat.
Finnish Booty Tanks:
Because Finland lacked heavy tractors capable of towing massive tanks, they only salvaged two T-28s that could drive away under their own power during the Winter War. These captured trophies were immediately integrated into the Finnish armored division and ironically repainted to fight against their former owners.

23 hours ago (edited) | [YT] | 10

Deathallo

I‘ll be Doing more herbivore dinosaurs on Riparia. Lambeosaurus, Iguanodon, Barsboldia, Styracosaurus, Albertaceratops, Eotriceratops, Anodontosaurus, Amargasaurus, Deinocheirus.

Skip the Carousel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

1 day ago | [YT] | 11