one*pap.

HE ASK BETTER YET HE PROPOSED A QUESTION. QUOTE: WHAT IF CATFISH AND THE GHOST ARE THE SAME ( PEOPLE).

MIND YOU THAT YOU CAN CLEARLY HEAR TWO DIFFERENT VOICES SPEAKING, AND NO I AM NOT A VOICE ANALYST " BUT REALLY" ARE PEOPLE GOING TO ALLOW THEMSELVES TO RECIEVE A PROPOSAL QUESTION TO EVEN ALLOW THEIR BRAIN TO WASTE TIME ON THAT CRAZY A&& QUESTION JUST TO BE EVEN MORE CONFUSED AREN'T THEM PEOPLE CONFUSED ENOUGH. WELL ANYHOOT THE REASON WHY HE PROPOSED THAT QUESTION WAS JUST AS HILARIOUS AS THE GARD DAWN PROPOSED QUESTION. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

NOW, LET ME MENTION THIS. ITS A RIDDLE ME THIS. ISN'T IT FUNNY HOW HIS SIS GETS PISS ABOUT THE ANTICS SHE BELIEVES OTHER PEOPLE HAVE PLAYED AROUND THIS R.KELLY CASE AND ALONE WITH OTHERS INCLUDING HERSELF AND THATS NOT WHATS SHE HERE FOR. HOWEVER CONTINUES TO SUPPORT AND LAUGH WITH THE PERSON THAT DIFFENITELY PLAYS AROUND IN THE FUCKERY SAND BOX.

NOW HERES ANOTHER GO FIGURE FOR YA. HE BLAMES NEICY MO FOR SHARING OUT R. KELLY PASSPORT AND OTHER BELONGINGS, BUT DRUNKIN LARRY CLEARLY TELLS YA WHO WAS IN R. KELLY HOME AND HAD STOLEN MONEY FROM R.KELLY AND WE ALL KNOW ABOUT DOCUMENTS AND THOSE THINGS WERE GIVEN TO THE DAD WHEREAS THAT BOY CLEARLY SHOWED POSSESSION OF THE PARTICLE IN QUESTION " PASSPORT" TO WHICH COULD'VE BEEN GIVEN TO HIM BY THE DAD AND PAID OFF TO GET IT OUT OF HIS HANDS SO THAT HE DOESN'T GET CAUGHT WITH IT.

SEE ITS MUCH EASIER TO BLAME SOMEBODY ELSE WHOM HAS SHOWED ANY KIND OF CLOSENESS TO R.KELLY TO REDIRECT THE HEAT OFF ONE SELF.
HOWEVER MAKES YOU SAY HUMMM 🤔 RIGHT

BUT LET THE FOOLISHNESS CONTINUES.
# NONEEDFORADEGREETOBEATHINKER

1 day ago (edited) | [YT] | 15

one*pap.

Holdup, Metclaf said he never been to jail. These people is on the move with exposing. OUCH

2 days ago | [YT] | 8

one*pap.

‪@Tearztooblunt4u‬ you need a man she can beef with you about lmao. It has to be a man involved. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

3 days ago | [YT] | 9

one*pap.

DAMMM. How could the Judge Roach lie bluntly to the public. He diffenitely said he didnt know that Metcalf father whooo chile.

3 days ago | [YT] | 4

one*pap.

So the jury of Carmelo Anthony case based their conviction on the surveillance tape, that i heard was a one on one CONFRONTATION 🤔. By the way they never mentioned who the one on one was with.

KEY WORD CONFRONTATION!

THE PEOPLE WHO SAW A 11 MIN VIDEO FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT SAYS THAT IT DIFFENITELY WAS A CONFRONTATION GOING ON EXCEPT THEY SAY ITS 4-6 HIGH SCHOOLERS THAT PUT THEY HANDS ON CARMELO.
WHO DO YOU BELIEVE?

5 days ago | [YT] | 3

one*pap.

Quote for today.
WISDOM OF YOURS DOESN'T NEED VALIDATION. USE WHAT YOU HAVE AND WATCH IT CARRY YOU A LONG WAY.
#ONEPAPOOSE

5 days ago | [YT] | 10

one*pap.

This is getting intresting
www.instagram.com/p/DZdNwQyKex4/?igsh=OWozb25nazI5…

Would you say so yes or no ?

They say the Attorney General has suppressed the 11 min video that can prove Carmelo Anthony was bullied by 4 -6 individuals. They are saying Carmelo was railroad.

Some people have argued that Carmelo should have taken the stand with hopes that his attorney would question him about being bullied and that alone would've explained his intent for having a weapon to protect himself while attending a track meet. However,due to an unexpected thunderstorm that sent him off to seek shelter under a tent where his rivals also seeked shelter the altercation popped off and this incident last a whole 4 minutes and resulted to the bully dying.

Because he didn't take that stand and Because of this video that everyone is speaking on that the jury didn't get to see because a distorted video replaced the video that everyone is speaking on. That allowed the prosecution to paint their perception of INTENT to the jury. Murder was the case they gave him. However,the judge did allow manslaughter as an option for the jury to convict. Carmelo attorney just didn't prove manslaughter either. He would've needed that 11 minute video that everyone is speaking on. So,therefore murder was the case they gave.

Hopefully this video gets great exposure and soon be showed to the world to see.

5 days ago (edited) | [YT] | 4

one*pap.

I READ THAT SHAT 4 FOUR TIMES. FUNNY ALL I CAN REMEMBER WHAT THAT GIBBERISH SHAT MENTIONING WAS PROSECUTOR, GREENBERG, AVENATTI. PHONE RECORDS, ETC.

I AM GOING TO NEED A CASE LOG WRITTEN BETTER TO UNDERSTAND THE POINT BEING MADE. MAYBE ITS STILL POINTING OUT THE CORRUPTION OR JUST EMBODIMENT BEHAVIOR. SEEMS TO ME SOMETHING IS OFF TRACK WITH THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK VS CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK VS PERSONAL FEELINGS FRAMEWORK. TO MAKE WHAT I JUST SAID MAKES SENSE. LET ME SAY THIS. THAT SHAT HAD SO MANY NARRATIVES TO IT WHICH LEADS ME TO BELIEVE ITS JUST TO KEEP THE MINDS CONFUSED.
LISTEN, WHEN A PERSON IS CONTINUOUSLY ON REPEAT TRYING TO MAKE SOMETHING STICK, THERE'S DIFFENITELY A MOTIVE LAYING SOMEWHEREZ.
#NOSHADE #JUSTDOINGTOMUCH

6 days ago (edited) | [YT] | 8

one*pap.

A interview with the judge finally happens what's your take.

1 week ago | [YT] | 1

one*pap.

I like listening from attorneys that were inside the court room.

1 week ago | [YT] | 0