New York Times featured Investigative Journalist, also featured in Bloomberg, The Guardian and more. I use OSINT (Open Source Intelligence) to investigate and expose criminal activity.

I've saved victims from tens of millions of dollars in losses and have helped government agencies across the world with high stakes investigations.

I bust scams and don't do it quietly. I am regularly threatened, sued and targeted by bad actors of all stripes... So bring it on! Contact me via WhatsApp: wa.me/+6421961652


DANNY DE HEK

I’m honestly disappointed after watching Earl “Batman” Stringer’s latest BG Wealth Sharing update video: https://youtu.be/2CN6EJIKOD4

After everything we discussed publicly in our interview — the recruitment culture, the false hope, the endless fees, the fake “copy and paste trading,” the organised scam networks behind these operations, and the devastating impact these schemes have on real people — Earl is STILL producing videos that emotionally keep people attached to the fantasy that their money might one day be “unfrozen.”

That is the problem.

In the video Earl openly says:
“Who knows, I might get my money unfrozen from DSJ.”

That statement alone proves he still fundamentally misunderstands what BG Wealth Sharing actually was.

This was not a legitimate trading company experiencing temporary problems.

BG Wealth Sharing displayed every classic red flag of a large-scale organised fraud operation:

* fake trading signals,
* endless “migration” fees,
* frozen withdrawals,
* pressure to recruit,
* constantly changing domains,
* secretive leadership,
* emotional manipulation,
* and repeated money grabs designed to milk existing victims for even more cash.

And now the scam has evolved yet again:

* Pay $100 to migrate
* Pay $300 for more “signals”
* Recruit more people to supposedly unlock withdrawals

How many red flags does it take before people stop calling this “confusing” and start calling it what it is?

A scam.

What frustrates me most is that during our interview Earl repeatedly avoided directly answering what the real purpose of his channel is.

But this latest video makes it painfully obvious:
BG Wealth Sharing content gets views.

The more chaos, fear, rumours, migration updates, and “maybe withdrawals are coming back” discussions there are, the more content opportunities exist.

So instead of fully exposing the reality and helping people emotionally detach from the scam, viewers are still being fed updates that keep the fantasy alive:
“Maybe funds come back.”
“Maybe withdrawals happen.”
“Maybe this new platform works.”

No Earl.

The money people saw on those dashboards was never sitting safely waiting to be released later.

These schemes survive by constantly recycling hope.

And that’s exactly why this type of content is dangerous.

I genuinely hoped after our interview Earl would pivot into properly exposing these operations because he clearly understands the culture, the psychology, and how these communities work.

Instead, he’s still sitting halfway between exposing the scam and emotionally entertaining the possibility that the fantasy might somehow become real again.

That keeps victims psychologically trapped.

At some point people need to stop chasing “unfreezing funds” and start accepting the reality that BG Wealth Sharing was never a legitimate opportunity in the first place.

13 hours ago | [YT] | 16

DANNY DE HEK

I joined a NodeLink Zoom meeting hosted by Craig Trewavis after multiple people contacted me asking whether the NX1 device was legitimate or just another crypto recruitment scheme wrapped in technical language. The meeting focused heavily on decentralised infrastructure, passive participation, and the idea that ordinary households could supposedly help build a global network simply by plugging a small device into their internet connection.

For nearly 30 minutes I waited to ask direct questions while the presentation moved through polished marketing slides and emotional language about “taking power back” from corporations. The presentation painted NodeLink as a revolutionary system capable of supporting encrypted browsing, AI security tools, Bitcoin-related functionality, and digital wallet services through a network of home-based devices.

But once questions finally started getting asked, the tone changed quickly.

Instead of clear answers about ownership, token mechanics, or external revenue, Craig repeatedly redirected us toward another meeting later that evening where apparently everything would be explained. That immediately stood out to me because legitimate businesses normally welcome scrutiny instead of delaying it.

*THE STORY NODELINK IS SELLING*

NodeLink describes itself as a decentralised infrastructure network powered by the NX1 device. Participants are told they can contribute unused internet capacity and computing power while benefiting from future ecosystem growth and token participation.

The company’s vision talks about building infrastructure so distributed that governments and corporations supposedly cannot control or shut it down. It presents a future where millions of devices support AI workloads, encrypted networking, storage services, and digital finance systems.

The marketing sounds impressive on the surface, but much of it appears built around future promises rather than independently verified commercial adoption today.

That distinction matters.

*THE NX1 DEVICE AND ITS CLAIMS*

The NX1 device is marketed as more than just hardware. NodeLink claims it includes encrypted browsing services, AI-powered security and ad blocking, Bitcoin hash participation, and a PayLink wallet with virtual card functionality.

The company also claims many of these services would normally cost hundreds of dollars per year separately.

But there are major gaps in what can actually be verified independently.

I could not find strong evidence showing large-scale adoption outside the NodeLink ecosystem itself. Much of the value appears internally defined through the company’s own promotional material rather than proven market demand.

That does not automatically make the technology fake.

What concerns me is how aggressively these future utilities are used to justify participation while important questions remain unanswered.

*THE BITCOIN MINING ANGLE*

One of the more interesting claims involves what NodeLink calls its “Hash Discovery Engine.” According to the company, the NX1 contributes SHA-256 computations to the Bitcoin network and if a valid block is discovered the reward supposedly goes directly to the participant’s wallet.

Technically, small-scale Bitcoin mining is possible.

But hidden underneath the excitement is a disclaimer stating the probability of discovering a valid block is low.

That disclaimer is important because presentations like this can create the emotional impression that passive Bitcoin rewards are quietly accumulating in the background when statistically the chances of meaningful returns may be extremely small.

Again, I am not saying the claim itself is impossible.

I am saying the marketing language can create unrealistic expectations for people who do not fully understand how difficult Bitcoin mining actually is.

*WHY THE ZOOM MEETING MATTERED*

The biggest concern for me was not the hardware itself.

It was the behaviour around the promotion.

When difficult questions were raised during Craig Trewavis’ Zoom meeting, there was no meaningful attempt to engage transparently with legitimate concerns. Instead, everything kept getting pushed into the future — another webinar, another rollout, another explanation still to come.

That pattern appears repeatedly in crypto MLM-style opportunities.

Momentum becomes more important than transparency.

I am not claiming NodeLink is definitively a scam.

But I am saying the company is making ambitious claims about decentralised infrastructure, AI services, digital finance, and token participation while many critical questions remain unanswered publicly.

READ THE FULL INVESTIGATION: www.dehek.com/general/scam-fraud-investigations/no…

1 day ago | [YT] | 2

DANNY DE HEK

I sat through a full UGC Protocol business presentation and what I found was not some revolutionary Web3 opportunity. It was a crypto matrix wrapped in smart contract language, promising daily profits, 200% returns, recruitment rewards, and a so-called Single Global Queue where new participants help push earlier participants toward payout.

Learn the warning signs before you lose money. The Scam Survival Guide Series: ko-fi.com/dehek/shop/thescamsurvivalguideseries If my work has helped you, consider supporting here: ko-fi.com/dehek Even a small amount helps me keep exposing scams. Anonymous support available. Thank you — Danny

THE PROMISE

UGC Protocol is being promoted as a decentralised Web3 ecosystem where people can earn between 0.5% and 3.33% daily, paid directly into their wallets. Promoter Rubén Lancia explains that users can start with as little as $10 and scale up to $20,000, with each position operating on what they call a 200% fulfillment model.

In plain English, they are telling people that $10 becomes $20, $1,000 becomes $2,000, and $20,000 becomes $40,000. That is the first major red flag.

THE QUEUE

The website describes a Single Global Queue, also called a monoline structure. New participants enter behind existing participants, and as the queue advances, earlier users move closer to completing their cycle.

Their own explanation says a $10 position receives $5, then $5, then $10, making a total return of $20. That means the payout appears to depend on later participants entering the structure after you. That is not normal investing. That is a queue-based money movement system.

RUBÉN LANCIA

During one of the Zoom meetings, Rubén Lancia displayed the wallet address 0x16d5B5dbE3380adACEc9B8CCCd1d57778D91DB49 while promoting UGC Protocol. That wallet now forms part of the evidence trail connecting the public promotion to on-chain activity.

In the official presentation, Lancia also explains that users are encouraged to reinvest once they complete their 200% cycle. He calls this reparticipation. At one point, he describes the system as “an infinite loop of money coming in.” That statement matters because it points directly to the central question: where is the money really coming from?

THE RECRUITMENT ENGINE

UGC Protocol is not just about passive crypto returns. It also uses a recruitment structure. Promoters are told they can earn 5% from direct recruits and continue earning down 14 levels through a unilevel compensation plan.

That is classic MLM architecture. The more people you bring in, the more positions are created, the more the queue moves, and the faster earlier participants can be paid. The system is dressed up as Web3, but the mechanics are very familiar.

THE SMART CONTRACT ILLUSION

Promoters keep pointing to smart contracts, PancakeSwap, blockchain transparency, and liquidity pools as proof that UGC is legitimate. But a smart contract does not automatically make a business sustainable.

A contract can execute perfectly while still redistributing money from newer participants to earlier participants. The real question is whether there is independently verifiable external revenue strong enough to support daily ROI, referral commissions, matrix payouts, and repeated 200% returns.

So far, the evidence points toward participant inflows, reinvestment cycles, and recruitment growth being central to the model.

WHY PEOPLE BELIEVE IT

People believe these schemes because early payments create confidence. They see wallet notifications, dashboards, countdown timers, and live transaction feeds. They start small, get paid small amounts, build belief, then put in more money and invite others.

That is how these systems gain momentum before they hit pressure.

When recruitment slows, queue movement slows. When queue movement slows, payouts become harder to sustain. That is the pattern I have seen again and again in crypto HYIPs, matrix cyclers, click-a-button scams, and MLM investment schemes.

UGC Protocol may call itself a Web3 monoline ecosystem, but the evidence shows daily ROI claims, 200% return promises, upline payments, 14-level commissions, wallet-based recruitment, and a structure that appears dependent on new money entering behind existing members.

READ THE FULL INVESTIGATION: www.dehek.com/general/scam-fraud-investigations/ug…

1 day ago | [YT] | 2

DANNY DE HEK

While investors were waiting for withdrawals, federal prosecutors say the money was flowing into mansions, supercars, luxury events, private jets, commercial office space, and extravagant personal spending. The latest forfeiture filing connected to Goliath Ventures gives the clearest picture yet of where investigators say investor money actually ended up — and the scale is staggering.

*FOLLOW THE MONEY*

On May 22, 2026, the United States Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Florida announced a major civil forfeiture action targeting properties, luxury vehicles, and other assets allegedly purchased using proceeds from the Goliath Ventures operation.

For anyone who has followed my investigation into Christopher Delgado and Goliath Ventures over the past year, this filing changes the conversation completely because investigators are no longer speaking in vague theories or broad accusations.

They are tracing assets.

They are tracing bank accounts.

They are tracing cryptocurrency wallets.

And according to federal prosecutors, the money trail leads directly into luxury homes, exotic vehicles, lavish events, and visible displays of wealth that investors were unknowingly financing behind the scenes.

*THE MONEY FLOW INVESTIGATORS TRACED*

According to the forfeiture filing, investigators say approximately $253 million flowed into a JPMorgan Chase account associated with Goliath Ventures, another $75 million flowed into Bank of America accounts, and approximately $62 million moved through Coinbase cryptocurrency wallets.

The filing further states that roughly $165 million was transferred between bank accounts and crypto wallets, while only around $1 million appears to have actually been deployed into liquidity pools.

That figure is devastating because investors were repeatedly told their money was actively generating profits through sophisticated cryptocurrency liquidity pool strategies capable of producing stable passive income returns.

But according to prosecutors, the overwhelming majority of the money never went where investors believed it was going.

*THE LUXURY EMPIRE*

The filing lays out a stunning list of assets prosecutors now say were purchased using investor money.

According to investigators, approximately $8.5 million was spent acquiring the Isleworth mansion in Windermere, Florida. Another $3.2 million allegedly went into a luxury property in Winter Park, while another $3.2 million was spent acquiring multiple downtown Orlando commercial condominium units.

Investigators also listed luxury properties in Sanford, Kissimmee, Winter Garden, and Apopka as part of the forfeiture action.

Then comes the vehicle collection.

A 2025 Lamborghini Revuelto purchased for approximately $719,517.

A Rolls Royce Ghost for approximately $379,995.

A Lamborghini Huracán EVO Spyder for approximately $473,723.

A Bentley Bentayga for approximately $285,540.

And multiple additional luxury vehicles prosecutors say were financed using investor funds.

*THE IMAGE WAS PART OF THE SALES PITCH*

One of the most disturbing parts of this entire case is how visible the wealth became.

Luxury offices.

Private jets.

Exotic cars.

High-end events.

Massive parties.

According to prosecutors, approximately $9 million was spent hosting a Goliath Christmas party in Miami during December 2025 while investors were reportedly facing withdrawal delays, banking excuses, compliance explanations, and technical problems accessing their money.

That contrast matters enormously because the visible luxury itself became emotional persuasion.

People saw wealth and assumed success.

They saw expensive offices and assumed legitimacy.

They saw payouts and assumed profitability.

And according to investigators, that confidence kept new money flowing into the system.

*WHY PEOPLE STAYED INSIDE THE SYSTEM*

One of the hardest things for outsiders to understand is why intelligent people remain invested even after serious warning signs begin appearing publicly.

But after years investigating operations like this, I can tell you the answer is usually not stupidity.

It is psychological entrapment.

Investors were reassured delays were temporary.

They were told audits were underway.

They were told banking issues were being resolved.

And many continued believing because accepting the truth meant confronting the possibility they had been manipulated all along.

That emotional trap keeps many schemes alive far longer than outsiders expect.

And now federal prosecutors are laying out what they believe was really happening behind the scenes.

READ THE FULL INVESTIGATION: www.dehek.com/general/scam-fraud-investigations/th…

Learn the warning signs before you lose money. The Scam Survival Guide Series: ko-fi.com/dehek/shop/thescamsurvivalguideseries

3 days ago | [YT] | 4

DANNY DE HEK

I’ve spent the last few days digging through Crybex Zoom calls, affiliate funnels, compensation plans, website pages, and recruitment videos, and the deeper I went, the more disturbing it became. What’s presented as an AI-powered crypto trading ecosystem quickly starts looking like another MLM recruitment machine wrapped in religion, emotional storytelling, and passive income promises. By the end of this investigation, I wasn’t looking at a serious trading company. I was looking at a system teaching people to recruit first and ask questions later.

*THE SALES FUNNEL TELLS THE REAL STORY*

One of the biggest red flags is the separate domain crybextech.com, which funnels people into “qualification” quizzes asking about audience size, affiliate experience, income goals, and how quickly they can start promoting. Visitors are pushed toward “earning with CryBEX” rather than understanding how the trading actually works.

The funnel constantly uses psychological triggers like “Reserve Your Spot,” “You’re Qualified,” and “Earn Financial Freedom.” It even separates users by location, asking whether they are based inside or outside the USA. That raises serious questions about compliance and liability concerns.

*NOAH GODSEY AND THE RELIGIOUS PITCH*

Promoter Noah Godsey has uploaded dozens of Crybex videos over the last three months including opportunity calls, withdrawal proof clips, onboarding tutorials, and compensation plan breakdowns. Some of these meetings literally begin with prayer before transitioning into AI bot profits and team-building recruitment.

Maria Elizabeth Van Niekerk, presented as CEO and co-founder, positions Crybex almost like a mission to help people escape poverty after previous crypto rug pulls. That emotional angle lowers scepticism because people begin trusting personalities and stories instead of demanding verifiable evidence.

*THE WEBSITE LOOKS POLISHED UNTIL YOU READ IT CAREFULLY*

Crybex claims its AI delivers a 94%+ success rate while analysing markets 24/7 with predictive modelling and automated execution. Yet there is no independently verified trading data, no audited results, and no meaningful transparency proving these claims.

The platform pushes crypto-only deposits and subscription plans requiring minimum balances in USDT. Meanwhile, the Terms page was broken unless manually accessed through a hidden URL, and the legal contact email points to [info@crainet.io](mailto:info@crainet.io) instead of a Crybex domain.

The listed London address is also a well-known virtual office location used by thousands of companies.

READ THE FULL INVESTIGATION: www.dehek.com/general/scam-fraud-investigations/cr…

5 days ago | [YT] | 3

DANNY DE HEK

Well… this was unexpected.

I’ve officially been featured on Pakistani television during a report about an alleged Karachi scam call centre investigation. The funny part? They referred to me as an “American investigative journalist” when I’m actually sitting here in New Zealand.

Still, it’s a surreal moment seeing my investigation work and social media posts discussed internationally while Pakistani authorities reportedly widen their probe into alleged scam call centres targeting foreign victims through fake loan settlements, financial relief schemes, and online fraud operations.

The report claims authorities detained 41 people during raids in Karachi while naming multiple alleged suspects connected to the network. Anti-money laundering investigations are also reportedly underway, and officials say more arrests could be coming.

For years many people dismissed these types of operations as internet rumours or isolated complaints. Now they’re being openly discussed on mainstream television alongside cybercrime investigations and international scrutiny.

Definitely not the way I expected to end up on Pakistani TV… but here we are.

6 days ago | [YT] | 4

DANNY DE HEK

People involved in BG Wealth Sharing are now being pushed into a brand-new platform called HQI Exchange, also known as HQIEX, after DSJEX withdrawals collapsed and victims found themselves locked out of their money. In this livestream investigation I walk through the evidence showing how the same manipulation tactics and fake trading mechanics appear to be continuing under a fresh brand while victims are pressured to deposit more USDT just to “recover” frozen balances.

THE COLLAPSE OF DSJEX

The story started with withdrawals slowing down and eventually freezing altogether. Members were told the DSJEX system was under pressure because of “regulatory investigations” and technical issues. Instead of admitting the platform itself may have failed, leadership figures inside BG Wealth Sharing introduced a completely new narrative.

Victims were informed that everyone would now need to migrate their balances to HQIEX to protect their funds. Messages circulated through BonChat groups claiming this was a temporary transition designed to safeguard members and restore normal operations.

But almost immediately the red flags started piling up.

Members were instructed to register on domains like hqi22.com, hqi23.com, hqi37.com, and hqi38.com before depositing another $100 USDT simply to activate the new accounts. Victims who had already lost money were now being asked to send more money just to access balances they supposedly already owned.

That is one of the oldest recovery scam tactics in existence.

THE DOMAIN NETWORK AND PHISHING WARNINGS

What caught my attention very quickly was the scale of the domain infrastructure behind HQIEX.

Some victims claimed the broader BG Wealth Sharing operation registered thousands of domains. I cannot independently verify all of those claims. However, I personally verified hundreds of suspicious domains connected to this ecosystem before eventually stopping because the list kept growing.

A tip of the hat to Oz from BehindMLM, who documented a large cluster of HQI Exchange domains tied directly to the migration operation now targeting BG Wealth Sharing victims.

At the same time browser security systems started flagging many of these domains with dangerous-site and phishing warnings. Some users attempting to access the HQIEX registration links were immediately confronted with warnings telling them attackers on the site may attempt to steal passwords, financial information, or personal data.

That should have been the moment everyone stopped.

Instead, many victims kept going because they were emotionally trapped by the hope of recovering their original balances.

THE CLICK-A-BUTTON TRADING ILLUSION

Once inside HQIEX, the mechanics appear almost identical to what people experienced inside BG Wealth Sharing and DSJEX.

Users are instructed to perform multiple “signal trades” per day by following prompts inside the platform. No trading knowledge is required. No strategy is needed. Participants simply click buttons, copy trades, and watch numbers increase on a screen.

The illusion works because people mistake interface activity for real profitability.

If genuine profitable algorithmic trading existed, there would be no reason for thousands of retail users to manually activate trades several times a day just to generate returns.

The platform controls deposits, withdrawals, account balances, and internal activity while users are conditioned to believe they are participating in legitimate trading operations.

Victims are now reporting additional withdrawal restrictions tied to fake “trading volume” requirements and warnings about massive handling fees if they attempt to withdraw too early.

That is not how legitimate exchanges operate.

That is how controlled financial traps operate.

BONCHAT, “ELENA,” AND THE MIGRATION PROCESS

Much of the communication surrounding the HQIEX rollout appears to happen through BonChat rather than transparent support systems.

Victims are directed toward anonymous handlers using names like Elena2026 and Stephen03, who coordinate account migrations and activation deposits behind the scenes.

One screenshot showed users being instructed to provide both their DSJ and HQI account numbers while ensuring at least $100 USDT remained available for activation purposes.

Legitimate financial institutions do not operate through underground chat groups where anonymous moderators manually coordinate migrations while controlling access to information.

And yet that appears to be exactly what is happening here.

THE PATTERN NEVER REALLY CHANGED

The more evidence I reviewed, the clearer the pattern became.

The same fake urgency.
The same frozen withdrawals.
The same domain rotation.
The same pressure to recruit.
The same signal-trading fiction.

Only the logo changed.

READ THE FULL INVESTIGATION: [www.dehek.com/general/scam-fraud-investigations/hq…

6 days ago | [YT] | 2

DANNY DE HEK

CoffeeZilla has just released a new video titled “$300m scammer makes a huge mistake” and this one absolutely dismantles Christopher Delgado’s WFTV interview piece by piece.

As many of you know, I’ve been covering Goliath Ventures Inc for months before the collapse became mainstream news, and one thing victims kept saying after these interviews aired was simple — “Why is Christopher Delgado being given a platform to control the narrative?”

Coffeezilla tackles that exact issue in this video.

He breaks down the unbelievable contrast between Delgado claiming he feels sorry for victims while sitting inside an 11,000-square-foot mansion surrounded by luxury items allegedly purchased with investor money. The Louis Vuitton pool table, the luxury cars, the designer clothes, the Hermes sandals beside the ankle monitor… Coffee explains why this interview may have actually done more damage to Christopher Delgado than helped him.

One of the strongest parts of the video is Coffeezilla exposing the “it wasn’t meant to be a Ponzi scheme” excuse. Christopher Delgado tries to argue that Goliath Ventures was simply a failed startup waiting for a product launch, but Coffee points out something incredibly important — the actual product they were pitching investors already existed and the returns they promised were mathematically impossible.

That is the key issue.

Victims were sold the illusion of sophisticated crypto investments, liquidity pools, passive returns, and exclusive wealth opportunities while money was allegedly being recycled between investors and spent on luxury lifestyles, marketing, conferences, and personal spending.

Coffeezilla also highlights something I completely agree with — Christopher Delgado did not build this operation alone.

A $328 million Ponzi scheme does not happen without recruiters, promoters, marketers, presenters, social proof, and people willing to publicly stand beside the brand while investors poured money in believing it was legitimate.

The other thing worth mentioning is that Coffeezilla directly acknowledged that Christopher Delgado sued me after I started exposing Goliath Ventures Inc early on. Independent investigative journalists often get attacked long before the mainstream catches up.

This video is well worth watching because it strips away the PR spin and exposes the psychology behind these scams — the ego, the flexing, the manipulation, and the complete disconnect from the victims who lost everything.

Watch the full video here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kmJtk...

1 week ago | [YT] | 13

DANNY DE HEK

Christopher Delgado did not build Goliath Ventures Inc alone. One of the biggest questions victims keep asking is simple: how does a man pull off a $328 million Ponzi scheme without an entire network helping create the illusion of legitimacy around him?

That’s the part of the story mainstream media still seems terrified to properly investigate.

While WFTV focused heavily on Delgado sitting inside his luxury mansion giving emotional interviews about “mistakes” and “pressure,” many victims were screaming at their televisions asking a completely different question — who were all the people standing beside him while this machine was growing?

Because scams like this don’t operate in isolation.

They require marketers.
They require recruiters.
They require presenters.
They require event organisers.
They require social proof.
They require influencers.
They require wealthy-looking people standing beside the CEO convincing everyone this operation is legitimate.

*THE IMAGE THAT RAISES BIG QUESTIONS*

The image shown in this video captures a large group connected to Goliath Ventures at the Vault 2025 conference linked to @BetDavidConsulting. Featured in the image are Christopher Delgado, Nick Petrillo, Tomo Marjanovic, David Panzik, Steve Davis, Alex Bukalo, James Delgado, Hunter Smallbach, Mariusz Chmielewski, Stephanie Hernandez, Michael Hernandez, Mike Chmielewski, Punit Shah, Matt Burks, Piers Curry, Jay Newton, Jonathan Mason, Dante Spitalieri, Vince Gratta, Marty Birthelmer, Casey Holladay, Eric Clayman, Matthew Malremes, Nadia Bringas, Eric Rideman, Douglas Sherman, and Gary Rice.

These weren’t random strangers accidentally appearing in the same room. These were people photographed beside Christopher Delgado while Goliath Ventures was aggressively expanding, attracting investors, and promoting a luxury lifestyle brand built around wealth, success, exclusivity, and financial freedom.

Victims now look back at these events very differently.

At the time, these conferences, professional photos, tailored suits, networking events, and social media appearances helped create the perception that Goliath Ventures was credible. Ordinary investors saw successful-looking people standing beside Delgado and assumed due diligence had already been done.

That’s how social proof works in modern Ponzi schemes.

The image becomes the product.

*THE LIFESTYLE WAS THE SALES PITCH*

Christopher Delgado was not selling audited financial statements.
He was selling aspiration.

Private jets.
Luxury cars.
Rolex watches.
Million-dollar homes.
Celebrity access.
Exclusive mastermind events.
High-end conferences.

The entire ecosystem surrounding Goliath Ventures appeared designed to project power, wealth, confidence, and momentum. Victims have repeatedly told me they believed if this many successful people were publicly attached to Goliath Ventures, then surely somebody must have verified where the money was coming from.

But according to federal investigators, investor money itself was allegedly being used to maintain the illusion.

That changes everything.

*WHY PEOPLE WANT ANSWERS*

The individuals shown in this image have not all been criminally charged, and their exact level of involvement varies significantly. Some may have simply promoted the business. Others may have attended events, recruited investors, handled operations, helped with marketing, or publicly endorsed Christopher Delgado and Goliath Ventures during its expansion.

But this is exactly why victims are demanding accountability.

Because many people now believe the success of Goliath Ventures depended on a network effect where credibility was constantly reinforced through public appearances, conferences, social media content, testimonials, and proximity to wealth.

And when withdrawals started freezing and investors began panicking, most of those same people suddenly disappeared.

That is why these images matter.

*THE QUESTIONS MAINSTREAM MEDIA STILL ISN’T ASKING*

Why haven’t more journalists identified the wider network surrounding Goliath Ventures?

Why are we seeing emotional sit-down interviews with Delgado while very little attention is being given to the people who helped promote the operation during its explosive growth phase?

Why are victims having to crowdsource evidence online while mainstream media waits for court filings instead of actively investigating the ecosystem surrounding this Ponzi scheme?

Those are the questions people want answered.

Because Christopher Delgado may have been the face of Goliath Ventures Inc, but victims increasingly believe he was never the entire machine.

And as more photos, videos, conference appearances, marketing material, and internal communications continue surfacing, the public is beginning to see just how many people stood beside him while investor money was pouring in.

Learn the warning signs before you lose money. The Scam Survival Guide Series: ko-fi.com/dehek/shop/thescamsurvivalguideseries

1 week ago | [YT] | 6

DANNY DE HEK

Earl “Batman” Stringer has agreed to come on live after Queen of Karma and I challenged the narrative that he was “just documenting his journey” with BG Wealth Sharing.

What started as a reaction to criticism has now turned into something much bigger — an open discussion about influence, accountability, MLM culture, and what happens when YouTubers publicly promote financial opportunities that later collapse.

Earl has spent more than 15 years on YouTube producing thousands of videos focused on making money online, affiliate marketing, MLM opportunities, and “financial freedom” style content. His thumbnails tell the story themselves: “$8000 1 Referral,” “The Best 3 MLM’s,” “Earn $1000 Pay Days,” and countless videos built around opportunity-driven marketing.

Then came BG Wealth Sharing.

THE BG WEALTH SHARING DEBATE

Earl says he believed BG Wealth Sharing was legitimate and was simply sharing his personal experience with the platform. But critics argue there is a major difference between privately documenting your journey and publicly publishing ongoing progress videos while viewers are signing up under you.

In his own response video, Earl admits people joined BG Wealth Sharing under him.

That changes the conversation completely.

Because these schemes do not spread through traditional advertising alone. They spread through trust, social proof, testimonials, livestreams, and everyday people presenting opportunities as normal, exciting, and profitable.

And when the platform eventually implodes, videos disappear, links vanish, and suddenly everyone claims they were “just sharing their story.”

QUEEN OF KARMA ENTERS THE CHAT

Queen of Karma produced a deep-dive documentary analysing BG Wealth Sharing, Earl’s content, and the wider culture surrounding MLM-style recruitment and manipulation tactics.

Rather than quietly backing away, Earl responded publicly, criticised the coverage, and challenged the criticism directed at him.

But instead of turning into another endless online argument, the conversation evolved into something more productive:
A live interview.

This is not about ambushing Earl or humiliating him.

This is about having a serious discussion around:

- MLM culture
- Affiliate marketing psychology
- Recruitment-driven business models
- “Documenting your journey” versus promotion
- Accountability when viewers lose money
- Why people fall for these systems repeatedly

FROM PROMOTER TO AVENGER?

One of the reasons this interview matters is because Earl clearly has influence, experience, and an understanding of how online marketing works.

The question is whether that energy can be redirected toward helping expose scams instead of unintentionally feeding them.

A lot of people involved in schemes like BG Wealth Sharing are not criminal masterminds. Many are ordinary people chasing opportunity, repeating marketing narratives, and slowly becoming part of the machine without fully understanding the consequences until it all collapses.

That is why these conversations matter.

Not just to expose the scam itself — but to expose the psychology behind how otherwise normal people end up promoting dangerous financial schemes to friends, family, subscribers, and entire online communities.

THE INTERVIEW GUESTS

Queen of Karma
youtube.com/@QueenOfKarma

Earl “Batman” Stringer
youtube.com/@EarlBatmanStringer

Danny de Hek
youtube.com/@DEHEK

THE BIGGER PICTURE

BG Wealth Sharing is only one example in a very long line of schemes built around hype, recruitment, false hope, and emotional manipulation.

The real challenge is helping people recognise the patterns before the next rebrand appears.

Because the internet is full of self-proclaimed financial heroes wearing masks, selling dreams, deleting evidence, and moving on to the next opportunity before victims even understand what happened.

Learn the warning signs before you lose money. The Scam Survival Guide Series: ko-fi.com/dehek/shop/thescamsurvivalguideseries

1 week ago | [YT] | 5