I’m Michelle, a science educator and chemistry PhD from Sydney, Australia. I’m here to help you work out which beauty products are worth buying and which aren’t, using science!
I started Lab Muffin because I was frustrated that there weren't enough easy-to-understand explanations of the science behind beauty products. I firmly believe that anyone can understand the science behind skincare and beauty.
For business/PR enquiries: michelle@labmuffin.com
DISCLAIMER: I am not a medical doctor. Care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information here, but it is provided for education and research purposes only and is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Always seek the advice of a qualified health provider regarding any medical conditions. No liability is accepted for any injury, loss or damage incurred by use of or reliance on the information provided by me.
Lab Muffin Beauty Science
Quick quiz: Here's the methods section from a study abstract.
Given this description, what would you expect the control shampoo to be?
----
Methods: Male and female subjects with normal scalp condition and self-perceived hair thinning participated in a 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical study assessing either a regimen of treatment shampoo and leave-on treatment containing functional antioxidant and barrier-enhancing agents or an identical placebo chassis shampoo control. The functional ingredients were piroctone olamine, zinc pyrithione, zinc carbonate, niacinamide, panthenol and caffeine. At baseline and after 8, 16 and 24 weeks of product use, several measurements were taken: hair shedding, total hair count (by phototrichogram), hair samples, TEWL and evaluation of biomarkers of scalp and hair conditions. Subjects also completed self-assessment questionnaires.
3 months ago | [YT] | 359
View 99 replies
Lab Muffin Beauty Science
Estrogen face creams - do they work and are they safe? Here's a breakdown of the benefits and risks, in collaboration with @Moskinlab and @DrJenGunter
A recent 2026 systematic review in J Am Amer Dermatol came to similar conclusions:
"Confident conclusions about efficacy cannot yet by drawn [...] larger controlled trials are needed to assess long-term safety, particularly endometrial risk in women with an intact uterus not on a progestogen." (Farkas et al, 2026)
Unfortunately there's a 10 image limit here, so the slides on safer alternatives, common myths and references didn't fit - you can see them on my IG or TT though, and I'll be doing a dedicated video on estrogen face creams with @Moskinlab 🤓
#estrogen #beautyscience #cosmeticsafety #toxicology
3 months ago | [YT] | 2,049
View 113 replies
Lab Muffin Beauty Science
Something I've noticed a lot more lately is identity-based motivated reasoning and confirmation bias - people only accepting evidence when it aligns with their political or other alignments. This has always been the case with a lot of anti-science movements like clean beauty, and I'm seeing this happen a lot around the issue of plastic...
Note: I definitely think we're using too much plastic, and there are concerns around the health impacts of microplastics. But overblowing the concerns, and switching to "eco" alternatives without looking at evidence, actually goes against the goals of better human and environmental health.
You might remember me debunking the famous "you have a spoon's worth of microplastics in your brain" study a while back. This is a massive overestimate, because the analytical method used was probably measuring fats as microplastic (the brain is a very fatty organ).
Mainstream media outlets like The Guardian are finally talking about this issue, and correcting their previous misinformation - something rare and commendable!
But because The Guardian quoted a former Dow chemist, there's been a lot of comments are accusing them of being "bought by Big Plastic". This is despite them ALSO quoting 2 independent scientists working at public institutions saying the same thing, plus they referenced a response letter written by 9 European scientists working at public institutions.
As my friend and misinformation PhD student Jen of @TheEcoWell says: "Discounting something solely based on funding source or affiliation is actually the opposite of critical thinking."
Looking at financial conflicts of interest is just ONE factor to take into account - you have to do the much harder work of actually thinking about the arguments presented. The Guardian article is communicated in a way that non-experts can definitely grasp!
Anyway, here's my analysis of the parallels between clean beauty and "plastic-free"...
there are LOADS more parallels I could've gone into:
- overfocus on endocrine disruption (linked to regressive traditional gender role BS)
- assuming really diverse ingredients are all the same
- brands trying to justify pseudoscience with "but it speaks to our customers"
- dodgy animal studies (one SICKO kept putting dogs and rats in polyester panties??!)
Also worth noting: a lot of the same "experts" fearmongering about parabens and phthalates are also now fearmongering about microplastics.
Good further reading:
Scientists talk about if you should be freaking out about microplastics (no, but it's reasonable to take some practical steps to reduce risk) www.sbs.com.au/news/the-feed/article/should-you-be…
Guardian article on microplastics www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/jan/13/microp…
My video with @TheEcoWell on greenwashing, including talk about plastic and LCAs: https://youtu.be/QpRNoDn59Lg
@TheEcoWell podcast with a microplastics researcher @dr_oli_jones www.theecowell.com/blog/the-truth-about-microplast…
My video debunking "microplastics in your brain" www.youtube.com/shorts/g0380f...
4 months ago | [YT] | 4,744
View 257 replies
Lab Muffin Beauty Science
How do you spot dodgy experts? Here's a quick guide to some common red flags 🤔
I go through this in my Fake Experts video as well! I designed this with Jen of @TheEcoWell who has a great free conference coming up on beauty misinformation - please let us know if you find this useful!
8 months ago | [YT] | 5,715
View 73 replies
Lab Muffin Beauty Science
I have no idea what this Community feature is so here's Truffle waiting politely for dinner
10 months ago (edited) | [YT] | 6,386
View 164 replies
Lab Muffin Beauty Science
@Moskinlab and I collaborated to debunk Dr Yvonne Burkart's sunscreen video - here's Mo's one!
1 year ago | [YT] | 313
View 16 replies
Lab Muffin Beauty Science
If you were wondering about the non-sciencey goss around the Valisure,@nerdcitypodcastdug into it and it's extremely interesting!! 👀
1 year ago | [YT] | 145
View 33 replies
Lab Muffin Beauty Science
Here's another video from our red light collaboration - @BeckyStern looks inside an LED mask!
1 year ago | [YT] | 186
View 5 replies
Load more