For years, veterinarians and caretakers have raised concerns about Librela.
Now, a new JAVMA paper exposes the problems with our current system of pre-approval animal testing.
Before Librela came to market, its safety testing included young, healthy, purpose-bred beagles housed in stainless steel cages. But the dogs who later received Librela in the real world were often older, painful, arthritic patients with vulnerable joints.
Post-market reports have raised serious concerns about rapidly progressive osteoarthritis and other severe musculoskeletal adverse events. And this problem exposes a system that gives the public a false sense of safety while relying on confined laboratory dogs who may be poorly suited to detecting the very harms we need to understand.
Instead of testing novel drugs on young, healthy purpose-bred dogs in commercial labs, caretakers should have the option to enroll their animals in carefully designed clinical studies, with full informed consent, funded diagnostics, baseline imaging, follow-up exams, and aggressive adverse event reporting.
That kind of research could help develop pain-relieving drugs while moving dogs out of commercial confinement and experimentation.
Would you allow your dog to participate in research like this if it meant better monitoring, better transparency, and fewer dogs bred for labs?
I’m a veterinarian and animal activist, and I recently examined hundreds of beagles as they came out of the soon-to-be-closed Ridglan Farms.
People often ask me: if we oppose commercial dog research colonies, how do we discover new treatments for dogs?
This UC Davis case is one example of the kind of animal research I support: a real patient, with a real medical problem, treated in that dog’s own best interest, with client consent and veterinary oversight.
The patient was a 2.5-year-old retired racing greyhound with multi-drug-resistant hookworm. After consultation with parasitologists, MDR1 testing, heartworm testing, and discussion with the client about the extra-label and experimental nature of the treatment, UC Davis initiated emodepside. After four treatments, combined with monthly moxidectin and imidacloprid, the dog eventually had a 100% reduction in fecal egg count.
That is very different from breeding dogs into commercial research colonies, infecting them, experimenting on them, and treating their lives as disposable.
The resistant hookworm crisis in greyhounds is also a warning. Racing greyhound farms created the conditions for this problem: repeated deworming schedules, constant environmental exposure in sand and dirt pens, reinfection from contaminated environments, infection through milk, and larvae that can arrest in tissues and later return to the intestine.
Animal exploitation creates problems, then teaches us to believe the only solution is more animal exploitation.
UC Davis shows another path: advancing treatment while prioritizing the best interests of patients who cannot consent.
And yet, UC Davis still trains veterinary students on animals who are killed solely for student education, when students could instead learn on animals who actually need procedures, under the guidance of experienced veterinarians.
Thank you to @WeAnimals for the greyhound racing images.
What do you think veterinary education and veterinary research should look like?
🚨 Mythbusting: The Save Our Bacon Act language will not prevent baby pigs from being crushed.
Prop 12 does not apply to the 5 days before pregnant pigs give birth or the time they are nursing, so prop 12 does not affect farrowing crates. It only applies to the gestation crates used to confine pregnant pigs for 114 days of their pregnancy.
Farm Bill update: The base text of the Senate Farm Bill does not include the “Save Our Bacon Act” language that would preempt state laws like California’s Proposition 12.
That is good news, but it is not over.
This language could still be added back during the Farm Bill process, and we need senators to hear from veterinarians, animal advocates, and voters now.
📞 Call your senators: 202-224-3121
Tell them:
“Please keep the Save Our Bacon Act language out of the Farm Bill. Protect state laws like California’s Proposition 12 and Massachusetts Question 3.”
The pork industry wants Congress to override state laws passed by voters. But they do not speak for the veterinary profession.
The Massachusetts Veterinary Medical Association sent a letter to their state representatives in Congress stating:
“Claims that the veterinary profession supports the preemption of state laws like Question 3 and Proposition 12 as passed by California, are false.
Transitions to group housing systems for pregnant sows have safely and successfully occurred in our state, and while good and adequate welfare is not guaranteed under these systems, research has identified the essential elements to ensure they do.”
Veterinarians should not be used to justify taking away voters’ rights or keeping pregnant pigs in crates so small they cannot turn around.
Call your senators today: 202-224-3121
Tell them: Keep Save Our Bacon Act language out of the Farm Bill. Protect Prop 12.
Are any other veterinarians frustrated that the National Pork Producers Council is using our profession to legitimize keeping pregnant pigs in gestation crates?
Gestation crates are roughly 2-by-7-foot stalls used to confine pregnant pigs for much of their 114-day pregnancy. They cannot even turn around.
California’s Proposition 12 simply set a minimum floor: pigs should be able to turn around and have at least 24 square feet of space.
Now, pork industry groups are trying to overturn that through Farm Bill language, using hashtags like #FixProp12 and claiming they are standing with “real farmers and veterinarians.”
But AVMA members were never polled before the AVMA sent a letter supporting language that would overturn Prop 12.
The AVMA does not speak for me on this.
Veterinarians should not be used to justify extreme confinement. Setting a minimum space requirement does not stop veterinarians from providing care. It does not prevent temporary individual housing when medically necessary or when animals are fighting.
It simply says pregnancy should not mean being locked in a crate so small an animal cannot turn around.
This is far from over. The Senate base text does not currently include the Prop 12 repeal language, but it could still be added back as an amendment.
Please call your senators today and tell them:
“I am a veterinarian, and I do not want the Farm Bill used to overturn California’s Proposition 12. Do not allow Save Our Bacon Act language back into the Farm Bill.”
Capitol Switchboard: 202-224-3121
Share this with veterinarians, veterinary students, and anyone who believes our profession should stand for animals, not corporate confinement.
Does your veterinary school give students enough surgical experience on animals who actually need care?
Across veterinary medicine, students, veterinarians, and educators are asking whether current methods are preparing graduates for real-world practice.
Surgical training is essential, are students receiving enough effective, hands-on experience that builds competence, confidence, and clinical judgment.
Some schools are expanding training through access-to-care models, where students perform supervised surgeries on animals who already need treatment and recovery. These programs can help students develop practical skills while providing care to animals and families who might otherwise go without it.
Others continue to rely on methods that may not give students enough meaningful surgical experience before graduation.
So we want to know:
Are veterinary students getting the surgical training they need?
Have you been through veterinary school? Are you a veterinarian, veterinary student, technician, educator, or mentor?
Share your experience and fill out our survey below!
Have you purchased or treated a sick puppy sold by Puppy Dreams or another pet store?
We are collecting stories from people who bought puppies from pet stores and later discovered health problems, misleading breeder information, or incomplete records.
We especially want to hear from veterinarians, customers, former employees, contractors, or anyone with information about sourcing, quarantine practices, veterinary records, transport, or sales scripts.
Your story could help show how these businesses operate and protect other families and dogs.
I’ll be speaking at Shared Worlds: Concepts, Conflicts, and Connections in Human-Animal Studies, hosted by the Arihanta Institute.
My talk is:
Beyond Cage-Free: Why Egg-Free Corporate Campaigns Offer a More Effective Path Forward
Cage-free campaigns are often celebrated as a major victory. But is it? Or are we simply enriching corporations and using grass-roots vegan activists as free marketing for the egg industry, thus increasing consumer trust and confidence in eggs?
Hens in cage-free systems still live inside crowded industrial buildings. They still come from hatcheries. They still have the sensitive tips of their beaks removed. They are still genetically selected to produce an unnatural number of eggs. They still face injuries, respiratory disease, feather pecking, cannibalism, bird flu outbreaks, mass killing, and slaughter.
Cage-free has also become a powerful marketing tool. It allows the egg industry to charge a premium while reassuring consumers that they are making a better choice.
In this talk, I’ll explain why animal advocates should move beyond cage-free reforms and focus on corporate campaigns that remove eggs from menus and supply chains entirely while expanding access to high-protein animal-free meals.
📅 August 1, 2026 🕘 Conference: 9:00 AM to 4:30 PM PDT 🎤 My talk: 11:20 to 11:40 AM PDT 💻 Virtual event
I’ll be speaking at Shared Worlds: Concepts, Conflicts, and Connections in Human-Animal Studies, hosted by the Arihanta Institute.
My talk is:
Beyond Cage-Free: Why Egg-Free Corporate Campaigns Offer a More Effective Path Forward
Cage-free campaigns are often celebrated as a major victory. But is it? Or are we simply enriching corporations and using grass-roots vegan activists as free marketing for the egg industry, thus increasing consumer trust and confidence in eggs?
Hens in cage-free systems still live inside crowded industrial buildings. They still come from hatcheries. They still have the sensitive tips of their beaks removed. They are still genetically selected to produce an unnatural number of eggs. They still face injuries, respiratory disease, feather pecking, cannibalism, bird flu outbreaks, mass killing, and slaughter.
Cage-free has also become a powerful marketing tool. It allows the egg industry to charge a premium while reassuring consumers that they are making a better choice.
In this talk, I’ll explain why animal advocates should move beyond cage-free reforms and focus on corporate campaigns that remove eggs from menus and supply chains entirely while expanding access to high-protein animal-free meals.
📅 August 1, 2026 🕘 Conference: 9:00 AM to 4:30 PM PDT 🎤 My talk: 11:20 to 11:40 AM PDT 💻 Virtual event
The so-called “Save Our Bacon” Act is NOT currently included in the base text of the Farm Bill.
But this battle is not over. Veterinarian Mónica Ramírez urges you to protect the pigs!
The language could still be added back in as an amendment, which means now is the time to call your Senators.
Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley said, “It’s got to be in the farm bill or it won’t get done. It’s pretty simple.”
Let's make sure it doesn’t get done!
Call the Capitol Switchboard: (202) 224-3121
Tell them:
Keep the so-called “Save Our Bacon” Act out of the Farm Bill.
This bill would undermine state laws that set basic standards for products sold within their borders, including laws that restrict the sale of pork from systems that confine pregnant pigs in gestation crates.
These laws don’t just protect animals; they also protect public health. and the right of states and voters to set meaningful standards.
Extreme confinement can elevate stress, suppress immune function, and increase pathogen growth, shedding, and transmission. Infected animals may remain asymptomatic through slaughter, allowing contaminated products to reach consumers.
Pork is already a major source of foodborne illness in the United States, with pathogens including Salmonella, Campylobacter, Yersinia, Listeria, Staphylococcus aureus, hepatitis E virus, and Toxoplasma gondii. Many of these pathogens can evade routine inspection, and several are increasingly resistant to medically important antibiotics.
The pork industry often argues that banning gestation crates “removes tools” from veterinarians and producers.
But a harmful practice does not become acceptable just because it gives an industry more flexibility.
That is exactly why animal welfare and public-health laws exist: to create a floor below which industries cannot fall.
States must be allowed to protect animals, consumers, and public health from the risks of extreme confinement and industry overreach.
You can also visit our website for a template letter to send to your Senators and downloadable flyers you can print for your veterinary office, clinic, school, or outreach table.
“Demonizing lab workers will not liberate animals.”
Madeline Krasno was an animal caretaker at the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s Harlow Primate Laboratory from 2011 to 2013, which resulted in a PTSD diagnosis and moral injury.
Today, she is the Executive Director of Justify, a 501c3 building a worker-led movement that supports animal lab workers, amplifies their voices, and accelerates the transition toward science without animal or human suffering.
At the AVA Summit, Madeline talks about animals the public rarely sees as individuals: mice, rats, fish, frogs, and monkeys bred into systems most people will never witness firsthand.
The system reduces them to numbers, protocols, models, and cage cards. But many of the people who care for them do see them as individuals. They know their personalities, they give them names, and grieve when they are gone.
Their stories restore individuality to animals hidden inside institutional systems. Their stories also have the power to shift public understanding, reduce isolation for other lab workers experiencing moral injury, and make animal research harder to justify.
Madeline also reminds us that shame does not encourage honesty. Demonization does not inspire change. Both promote silence. And silence protects systems.
We need space for the people closest to the suffering to tell the truth, process what they have seen, and become part of the movement for animal-free, human-relevant science.
Our Honor
For years, veterinarians and caretakers have raised concerns about Librela.
Now, a new JAVMA paper exposes the problems with our current system of pre-approval animal testing.
Before Librela came to market, its safety testing included young, healthy, purpose-bred beagles housed in stainless steel cages. But the dogs who later received Librela in the real world were often older, painful, arthritic patients with vulnerable joints.
Post-market reports have raised serious concerns about rapidly progressive osteoarthritis and other severe musculoskeletal adverse events. And this problem exposes a system that gives the public a false sense of safety while relying on confined laboratory dogs who may be poorly suited to detecting the very harms we need to understand.
Instead of testing novel drugs on young, healthy purpose-bred dogs in commercial labs, caretakers should have the option to enroll their animals in carefully designed clinical studies, with full informed consent, funded diagnostics, baseline imaging, follow-up exams, and aggressive adverse event reporting.
That kind of research could help develop pain-relieving drugs while moving dogs out of commercial confinement and experimentation.
Would you allow your dog to participate in research like this if it meant better monitoring, better transparency, and fewer dogs bred for labs?
Let me know what you think.
#animalresearch #librela #ridglanfarms #beagles #animalrights
1 day ago | [YT] | 3
View 0 replies
Our Honor
I’m a veterinarian and animal activist, and I recently examined hundreds of beagles as they came out of the soon-to-be-closed Ridglan Farms.
People often ask me: if we oppose commercial dog research colonies, how do we discover new treatments for dogs?
This UC Davis case is one example of the kind of animal research I support: a real patient, with a real medical problem, treated in that dog’s own best interest, with client consent and veterinary oversight.
The patient was a 2.5-year-old retired racing greyhound with multi-drug-resistant hookworm. After consultation with parasitologists, MDR1 testing, heartworm testing, and discussion with the client about the extra-label and experimental nature of the treatment, UC Davis initiated emodepside. After four treatments, combined with monthly moxidectin and imidacloprid, the dog eventually had a 100% reduction in fecal egg count.
That is very different from breeding dogs into commercial research colonies, infecting them, experimenting on them, and treating their lives as disposable.
The resistant hookworm crisis in greyhounds is also a warning. Racing greyhound farms created the conditions for this problem: repeated deworming schedules, constant environmental exposure in sand and dirt pens, reinfection from contaminated environments, infection through milk, and larvae that can arrest in tissues and later return to the intestine.
Animal exploitation creates problems, then teaches us to believe the only solution is more animal exploitation.
UC Davis shows another path: advancing treatment while prioritizing the best interests of patients who cannot consent.
And yet, UC Davis still trains veterinary students on animals who are killed solely for student education, when students could instead learn on animals who actually need procedures, under the guidance of experienced veterinarians.
Thank you to @WeAnimals for the greyhound racing images.
What do you think veterinary education and veterinary research should look like?
#animalresearch #animalwelfare #animalrights #animalexperimentation #3rs
1 day ago | [YT] | 3
View 0 replies
Our Honor
🚨 Mythbusting: The Save Our Bacon Act language will not prevent baby pigs from being crushed.
Prop 12 does not apply to the 5 days before pregnant pigs give birth or the time they are nursing, so prop 12 does not affect farrowing crates. It only applies to the gestation crates used to confine pregnant pigs for 114 days of their pregnancy.
Farm Bill update: The base text of the Senate Farm Bill does not include the “Save Our Bacon Act” language that would preempt state laws like California’s Proposition 12.
That is good news, but it is not over.
This language could still be added back during the Farm Bill process, and we need senators to hear from veterinarians, animal advocates, and voters now.
📞 Call your senators: 202-224-3121
Tell them:
“Please keep the Save Our Bacon Act language out of the Farm Bill. Protect state laws like California’s Proposition 12 and Massachusetts Question 3.”
The pork industry wants Congress to override state laws passed by voters. But they do not speak for the veterinary profession.
The Massachusetts Veterinary Medical Association sent a letter to their state representatives in Congress stating:
“Claims that the veterinary profession supports the preemption of state laws like Question 3 and Proposition 12 as passed by California, are false.
Transitions to group housing systems for pregnant sows have safely and successfully occurred in our state, and while good and adequate welfare is not guaranteed under these systems, research has identified the essential elements to ensure they do.”
Veterinarians should not be used to justify taking away voters’ rights or keeping pregnant pigs in crates so small they cannot turn around.
Call your senators today: 202-224-3121
Tell them: Keep Save Our Bacon Act language out of the Farm Bill. Protect Prop 12.
#prop12 #fixprop12 #saveourbacon #farmbill #vetmed
1 week ago | [YT] | 4
View 0 replies
Our Honor
Are any other veterinarians frustrated that the National Pork Producers Council is using our profession to legitimize keeping pregnant pigs in gestation crates?
Gestation crates are roughly 2-by-7-foot stalls used to confine pregnant pigs for much of their 114-day pregnancy. They cannot even turn around.
California’s Proposition 12 simply set a minimum floor: pigs should be able to turn around and have at least 24 square feet of space.
Now, pork industry groups are trying to overturn that through Farm Bill language, using hashtags like #FixProp12 and claiming they are standing with “real farmers and veterinarians.”
But AVMA members were never polled before the AVMA sent a letter supporting language that would overturn Prop 12.
The AVMA does not speak for me on this.
Veterinarians should not be used to justify extreme confinement. Setting a minimum space requirement does not stop veterinarians from providing care. It does not prevent temporary individual housing when medically necessary or when animals are fighting.
It simply says pregnancy should not mean being locked in a crate so small an animal cannot turn around.
This is far from over. The Senate base text does not currently include the Prop 12 repeal language, but it could still be added back as an amendment.
Please call your senators today and tell them:
“I am a veterinarian, and I do not want the Farm Bill used to overturn California’s Proposition 12. Do not allow Save Our Bacon Act language back into the Farm Bill.”
Capitol Switchboard: 202-224-3121
Share this with veterinarians, veterinary students, and anyone who believes our profession should stand for animals, not corporate confinement.
#prop12 #pork #vetmed #avma2026 #vetstudent
1 week ago | [YT] | 5
View 0 replies
Our Honor
Does your veterinary school give students enough surgical experience on animals who actually need care?
Across veterinary medicine, students, veterinarians, and educators are asking whether current methods are preparing graduates for real-world practice.
Surgical training is essential, are students receiving enough effective, hands-on experience that builds competence, confidence, and clinical judgment.
Some schools are expanding training through access-to-care models, where students perform supervised surgeries on animals who already need treatment and recovery. These programs can help students develop practical skills while providing care to animals and families who might otherwise go without it.
Others continue to rely on methods that may not give students enough meaningful surgical experience before graduation.
So we want to know:
Are veterinary students getting the surgical training they need?
Have you been through veterinary school? Are you a veterinarian, veterinary student, technician, educator, or mentor?
Share your experience and fill out our survey below!
#VetMed #VetSchool #VetStudent #Veterinarian #AccessToCare
4 weeks ago | [YT] | 1
View 1 reply
Our Honor
Have you purchased or treated a sick puppy sold by Puppy Dreams or another pet store?
We are collecting stories from people who bought puppies from pet stores and later discovered health problems, misleading breeder information, or incomplete records.
We especially want to hear from veterinarians, customers, former employees, contractors, or anyone with information about sourcing, quarantine practices, veterinary records, transport, or sales scripts.
Your story could help show how these businesses operate and protect other families and dogs.
#puppydreams #puppymill #dogs #puppies #petstore
1 month ago | [YT] | 5
View 0 replies
Our Honor
I’ll be speaking at Shared Worlds: Concepts, Conflicts, and Connections in Human-Animal Studies, hosted by the Arihanta Institute.
My talk is:
Beyond Cage-Free: Why Egg-Free Corporate Campaigns Offer a More Effective Path Forward
Cage-free campaigns are often celebrated as a major victory. But is it? Or are we simply enriching corporations and using grass-roots vegan activists as free marketing for the egg industry, thus increasing consumer trust and confidence in eggs?
Hens in cage-free systems still live inside crowded industrial buildings. They still come from hatcheries. They still have the sensitive tips of their beaks removed. They are still genetically selected to produce an unnatural number of eggs. They still face injuries, respiratory disease, feather pecking, cannibalism, bird flu outbreaks, mass killing, and slaughter.
Cage-free has also become a powerful marketing tool. It allows the egg industry to charge a premium while reassuring consumers that they are making a better choice.
In this talk, I’ll explain why animal advocates should move beyond cage-free reforms and focus on corporate campaigns that remove eggs from menus and supply chains entirely while expanding access to high-protein animal-free meals.
📅 August 1, 2026
🕘 Conference: 9:00 AM to 4:30 PM PDT
🎤 My talk: 11:20 to 11:40 AM PDT
💻 Virtual event
#cagefree #eggfree #vetmed #onehealth #animalrights
1 month ago | [YT] | 12
View 1 reply
Our Honor
I’ll be speaking at Shared Worlds: Concepts, Conflicts, and Connections in Human-Animal Studies, hosted by the Arihanta Institute.
My talk is:
Beyond Cage-Free: Why Egg-Free Corporate Campaigns Offer a More Effective Path Forward
Cage-free campaigns are often celebrated as a major victory. But is it? Or are we simply enriching corporations and using grass-roots vegan activists as free marketing for the egg industry, thus increasing consumer trust and confidence in eggs?
Hens in cage-free systems still live inside crowded industrial buildings. They still come from hatcheries. They still have the sensitive tips of their beaks removed. They are still genetically selected to produce an unnatural number of eggs. They still face injuries, respiratory disease, feather pecking, cannibalism, bird flu outbreaks, mass killing, and slaughter.
Cage-free has also become a powerful marketing tool. It allows the egg industry to charge a premium while reassuring consumers that they are making a better choice.
In this talk, I’ll explain why animal advocates should move beyond cage-free reforms and focus on corporate campaigns that remove eggs from menus and supply chains entirely while expanding access to high-protein animal-free meals.
📅 August 1, 2026
🕘 Conference: 9:00 AM to 4:30 PM PDT
🎤 My talk: 11:20 to 11:40 AM PDT
💻 Virtual event
#cagefree #eggfree #vetmed #onehealth #animalrights
1 month ago | [YT] | 12
View 0 replies
Our Honor
The so-called “Save Our Bacon” Act is NOT currently included in the base text of the Farm Bill.
But this battle is not over. Veterinarian Mónica Ramírez urges you to protect the pigs!
The language could still be added back in as an amendment, which means now is the time to call your Senators.
Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley said, “It’s got to be in the farm bill or it won’t get done. It’s pretty simple.”
Let's make sure it doesn’t get done!
Call the Capitol Switchboard: (202) 224-3121
Tell them:
Keep the so-called “Save Our Bacon” Act out of the Farm Bill.
This bill would undermine state laws that set basic standards for products sold within their borders, including laws that restrict the sale of pork from systems that confine pregnant pigs in gestation crates.
These laws don’t just protect animals; they also protect public health. and the right of states and voters to set meaningful standards.
Extreme confinement can elevate stress, suppress immune function, and increase pathogen growth, shedding, and transmission. Infected animals may remain asymptomatic through slaughter, allowing contaminated products to reach consumers.
Pork is already a major source of foodborne illness in the United States, with pathogens including Salmonella, Campylobacter, Yersinia, Listeria, Staphylococcus aureus, hepatitis E virus, and Toxoplasma gondii. Many of these pathogens can evade routine inspection, and several are increasingly resistant to medically important antibiotics.
The pork industry often argues that banning gestation crates “removes tools” from veterinarians and producers.
But a harmful practice does not become acceptable just because it gives an industry more flexibility.
That is exactly why animal welfare and public-health laws exist: to create a floor below which industries cannot fall.
States must be allowed to protect animals, consumers, and public health from the risks of extreme confinement and industry overreach.
You can also visit our website for a template letter to send to your Senators and downloadable flyers you can print for your veterinary office, clinic, school, or outreach table.
#prop12 #saveourbacon #farmbill #vetmed #onehealth
1 month ago | [YT] | 2
View 1 reply
Our Honor
“Demonizing lab workers will not liberate animals.”
Madeline Krasno was an animal caretaker at the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s Harlow Primate Laboratory from 2011 to 2013, which resulted in a PTSD diagnosis and moral injury.
Today, she is the Executive Director of Justify, a 501c3 building a worker-led movement that supports animal lab workers, amplifies their voices, and accelerates the transition toward science without animal or human suffering.
At the AVA Summit, Madeline talks about animals the public rarely sees as individuals: mice, rats, fish, frogs, and monkeys bred into systems most people will never witness firsthand.
The system reduces them to numbers, protocols, models, and cage cards. But many of the people who care for them do see them as individuals. They know their personalities, they give them names, and grieve when they are gone.
Their stories restore individuality to animals hidden inside institutional systems. Their stories also have the power to shift public understanding, reduce isolation for other lab workers experiencing moral injury, and make animal research harder to justify.
Madeline also reminds us that shame does not encourage honesty. Demonization does not inspire change. Both promote silence. And silence protects systems.
We need space for the people closest to the suffering to tell the truth, process what they have seen, and become part of the movement for animal-free, human-relevant science.
#animalresearch #vetmed #onehealth #3rs #avasummit #ava2026
1 month ago | [YT] | 0
View 0 replies
Load more