Hillary Lin, MD

Statins have somehow become a culture-war drug.

That is the wrong frame. The decision should be about absolute cardiovascular risk, likely benefit from LDL/apoB lowering, and individual tradeoffs: side effects, diabetes risk, pregnancy plans, interactions, cost, and monitoring.

Would you want a longer video on how I think through the statin decision?

Skip the Carousel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

2 weeks ago | [YT] | 47

Hillary Lin, MD

Is the biggest longevity drug almost here?

Retatrutide is not FDA-approved, and it has not been shown to extend lifespan.

But the reason this category matters is bigger than weight loss. GLP-1/GIP/glucagon drugs are starting to touch the risk stack that shortens modern lives: visceral fat, glucose, BP, sleep apnea, kidney and cardiovascular risk, inflammation-adjacent markers, and mobility.

So here is the real question: what should count as a “longevity drug”?

Skip the Carousel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

3 weeks ago | [YT] | 32

Hillary Lin, MD

Quick nutrition check: do you think of juice as fruit?

I don’t think sugar is the enemy. But sugar removed from the structure that slows it down behaves differently. Whole fruit comes with fiber, chewing, water, volume, and satiety. Juice is much easier to overdo.

Would you rather see a longer video on fruit, juice, blood pressure, and metabolic health?

Skip the Carousel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

3 weeks ago | [YT] | 37

Hillary Lin, MD

Quick cookware label decoder:

“Non-toxic” is not a material.

PFOA-free ≠ PFAS-free.
PTFE-free is a stronger clue.
Ceramic is useful but finite-life.
Titanium can mean very different surfaces.

Full guide: hillarylinmd.com/guides/safe-nonstick-cookware

What label has confused you most: PFAS-free, PTFE-free, ceramic, or titanium?

Skip the Carousel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 month ago | [YT] | 23

Hillary Lin, MD

Easy take: Enhanced Games = doping spectacle.
More useful take: it was a live demo of surrogate-vs-outcome thinking.

Performance drugs can change physiology. But one drug-permitted event still gave us one unofficial swim mark, most records intact, and several reported non-enhanced winners.

Longevity medicine has the same trap: a better lab, hormone level, recovery marker, or symptom score is not automatically better long-term health.

What’s the part worth debating most: athlete autonomy, fair competition, medical safety, or what this teaches us about health optimization?

Skip the Carousel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

1 month ago | [YT] | 23

Hillary Lin, MD

Hormones can be real medicine. The problem is when "normal is not optimal" becomes a subscription model.

Swipe through for the difference between treating a true endocrine issue and chasing numbers with no plan.

Better question than "are my hormones optimal?": what axis are we treating, what outcome are we measuring, what risk are we accepting, and when do we stop?

Question for the comments: what hormone claim do you see most often online?

Skip the Carousel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 months ago | [YT] | 20

Hillary Lin, MD

Part 3 of The Modern Lipid Playbook is live.

This one is the treatment ladder: what happens after you know your LDL, ApoB, Lp(a), family history, and overall risk pattern?

We cover:
• why ApoB can change the conversation
• why Lp(a) matters even when LDL looks “fine”
• where statins fit
• why ezetimibe is boring but useful
• when PCSK9s / inclisiran become relevant
• what’s emerging but not routine care yet
• the questions to bring to a 15-minute lipid visit

The big frame: cholesterol treatment is not about chasing one lab number. It’s about lowering lifetime plaque/event risk in a way that fits the person in front of you.

Watch here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkSrZ...

Skip the Carousel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 months ago | [YT] | 60

Hillary Lin, MD

Pickleball somehow became the group-chat sport of aging well.

I do not think the paddle is magic. I do think the physiology is interesting.

A rally bundles power, braking, balance, reaction time, visual tracking, cardio bursts, and play. That is a useful longevity-training template, especially because people keep showing up.

The evidence is promising, not magical: pickleball can reach moderate-to-vigorous intensity in older adults, and one small supervised 8-week trial in pre-frail adults found improvements in pre-frailty status and functional fitness.

Not proof that pickleball prevents dementia, falls, fractures, osteoporosis, or death.

So the practical question is: if you do not play pickleball, what is your version of this?

Tennis, dance, martial arts drills, hiking group, basketball shooting, a class with friends - anything that makes you move, react, breathe harder, and come back.

Full essay: newsletter.hillarylinmd.com/p/pickleball-ultimate-…

Skip the Carousel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

2 months ago | [YT] | 19

Hillary Lin, MD

Most supplement stacks I see are not too small. They are too crowded.

Swipe through this before adding another bottle. The filter is simple: human evidence, dose, safety, and a reason to keep taking it.

Creatine survives. Some omega-3 survives. Magnesium depends on the person. NMN/NR are interesting, not proven longevity drugs. Resveratrol and proprietary "longevity blends" are where I get skeptical.

Question for the comments: what supplement category feels most over-marketed right now?

Skip the Carousel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 months ago | [YT] | 33

Hillary Lin, MD

A $4 cholesterol drug reduces Alzheimer's risk by 7x.

It's been FDA-approved since 2002. Almost nobody's using it for this.

That's ezetimibe — one of 10 generics with serious mortality data in the carousel above. Total cost: ~$50/month.

💊 Tadalafil — near the top when 407 drugs were screened for all-cause mortality. Yes, that one.
💊 Women's HRT — the WHI study got it wrong. Here's what the real timing data shows.
💊 Rapamycin — the only drug extending lifespan in every major animal model.

Dropping a deep-dive video on the top 3 most underrated ones soon.

Which one do you want me to cover first? 👇

‪@agelessrx‬

Skip the Carousel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 months ago | [YT] | 62