This channel has evolved to address corruption within Burnet County. The reprehensible indifference of our local officials to the blatant fraud is deeply troubling. Windermere Oaks Water Supply Corp.
Sheriff Calvin Boyd of Burnet County appears more committed to shielding wrongdoers than fulfilling his responsibilities. Detective Chris King's infringement of my First Amendment rights during an open meeting has gone without any repercussions.
The Dana Martin Jury Verdict is In! integritynow1.net/jury-verdict-martin
#auditor #corruption
Texas Property Code
Open Board Meetings
Sec. 209.0051
Subsection (c)
"Regular and special board meetings must be open to owners, subject to the right of the board to adjourn a board meeting and reconvene in closed executive session..." These are open/public meetings in Texas as required by the property code.
Texas is a one party notice/consent state for recordings.
#accountability #corruptionexposed #firstamendment G3 Public Relations
IntegrityNowNews
🎉 700 Subscribers! 🎉
A huge thank you to everyone who has subscribed to IntegrityNowNews. This channel exists because people care about transparency, accountability, and the truth, and your support proves that message matters.
Truth travels fast when people pay attention. More to come.
6 months ago | [YT] | 1
View 0 replies
IntegrityNowNews
You’ve got to check out this video—Justin Pulliam, the legend himself, is my mentor! Trust me, you don't want to miss this!
1 year ago | [YT] | 2
View 0 replies
IntegrityNowNews
Texas Property Code
Open Board Meetings
Sec. 209.0051
Subsection (c)
"Regular and special board meetings must be open to owners, subject to the right of the board to adjourn a board meeting and reconvene in closed executive session..."
This was an open/public meeting as required by the property code.
Open meetings in TX are not subject to privacy interests and can be recorded by the invited public attending said open meeting.
Texas is a one party notice/consent state for recordings. The person doing the recording consents. If this were a true telephonic conf call they would have no claim. The fact this was a video conf call does not change the analysis.
The HOA/POA board cannot simply declare an entire meeting as private/not open in direct violation of the Property Code. Such a declaration is void as a matter of law.
3 years ago | [YT] | 4
View 0 replies