THE SHOUT OUT GIRLS !!! 🗣🗣

...

16 hours ago | [YT] | 0

THE SHOUT OUT GIRLS !!! 🗣🗣

WHAT AHAPPENED TO "ACTION ALEX"!!!??

2 days ago | [YT] | 0

THE SHOUT OUT GIRLS !!! 🗣🗣

Flock cameras capture more than plates. They build searchable vehicle profiles, log GPS coordinates, and store 30 days of your movements on cloud servers accessible by law enforcement nationwide.

This episode covers:
•How Flock's 90,000 cameras scan 20 billion vehicles a month across 49 states
•Documented abuse by officers using the system to track ex-partners and surveil women across state lines
•The growing list of cities canceling Flock contracts after privacy outcry
•Fourth Amendment case law from Katz to Carpenter and where Flock surveillance fits
•The potential path from Flock data to aggregators like Palantir

If your city is considering Flock cameras, this episode explains what the sales pitch leaves out.

Key Takeaways:

00:00 Flock cameras are watching your neighborhood
00:43 What Flock Safety really is
01:55 How Flock builds your vehicle fingerprint
05:07 Cities canceling Flock contracts
06:06 Federal court rules Flock is constitutional
07:55 How Flock gets misused to track people
10:24 Fourth Amendment and surveillance precedent
12:37 State laws fighting back against Flock
13:54 The false security of mass surveillance
15:23 How Flock feeds Palantir and Peter Thiel

4 days ago | [YT] | 0

THE SHOUT OUT GIRLS !!! 🗣🗣

An Idaho group says the contracts behind Flock license plate cameras break state law by allowing commercial use of data and is threatening to sue four cities.

5 days ago | [YT] | 2

THE SHOUT OUT GIRLS !!! 🗣🗣

HELP US CREATE A WINNING BINGO BOARD THIS WEEK!!!

Skip the Carousel

1 2

1 week ago | [YT] | 2

THE SHOUT OUT GIRLS !!! 🗣🗣

...

1 week ago | [YT] | 0

THE SHOUT OUT GIRLS !!! 🗣🗣

WHY DON'T THE PRO-POLICE FOLKS SPEAK UP AND WORK HARDER TO CLEAN UP LAW ENFORCEMENT !?

WHY ARE *WE* THE ONES TO POINT OUT THE POLICE MISCONDUCT, WHEN THEY IGNORE IT, EXCUSE IT AND ENABLE IT GET WORSE...? 🤔

WHY DO BLUE-BACKERS FIGHT AGAINST THOSE WHO WANT TO HOLD BAD ACTORS ACCOUNTABLE ??!

1 week ago | [YT] | 7

THE SHOUT OUT GIRLS !!! 🗣🗣

FLETCHER USES FLOCK CAMERAS AS HIS PERSONAL SECURITY SYSTEM!! CAMERAS SURROUND THE CITY OF NORTH OAKS AT $3K/MONTH!!! HE ALSO GOT QUITE A FEW FOLKS THAT ALSO LIVE IN NORTH OAKS TO DONATE TO HIS RE-ELECTION CAMPAIGN SO WE TAXPAYERS CONTINUE PAYING FOR IT ..!!!

https://youtu.be/_GXHHO3I5vM?si=xxICa...

1 week ago | [YT] | 2

THE SHOUT OUT GIRLS !!! 🗣🗣

NEVER FORGET.....
....HOW FAST FLETCHER ASKED FOR HIS MONEY BACK!!!

Skip the Carousel

1 2 3

1 week ago | [YT] | 3

THE SHOUT OUT GIRLS !!! 🗣🗣

HOW BAD DOES A COP HAVE TO BE, FOR A COP IN ANOTHER JURISDICTION TO SEEK OUT THE SUPERVISORS AND REPORT THE BAD BEHAVIOR??
YES, OF COURSE, DUGGER WAS HIRED BY BOB FLETCHER!!!
___________ __________ __________ _____________ _________ _________
# Chris Dugger Career Summary (through June 2011)
The following summary is based **only** on information contained in the Internal Affairs Executive Summary and witness statements.
## Early Background
According to Commander Rich Clark, Chris Dugger first became known to Ramsey County law enforcement around **2002**, when he was providing narcotics-related information to various agencies as a civilian informant. Clark stated Dugger had previously provided information to:
* ATF
* Minnesota Gang Strike Force
* Dakota County Narcotics
Clark described Dugger as a **non-criminal informant** who provided information to Ramsey County Narcotics and participated in one or two controlled buys. Clark stated Dugger's information was consistently corroborated and professional.
---
## Ramsey County Sheriff's Office Employment
Dugger stated he began working with the Ramsey County Sheriff's Department in **2007** as a confidential informant using the assumed name:
**Richard Lewis**
He was sworn in as a **Deputy Sheriff in December 2008**.
By 2011, his assignments had included:
* Jail operations
* Court Security Division
He stated he was working a weekday schedule of approximately 0900–1700 hours.
The report specifically notes that he **had not received Patrol Field Training**.
---
## Reputation Within the Department
Several supervisors described Dugger as:
* Dedicated
* Serious about police work
* Motivated
* Professional when working investigations
Commander Rich Clark stated Dugger:
* "did his homework"
* took investigations seriously
* was extremely dedicated
* wanted to do good work for the department
However, Clark also described Dugger as someone who wanted to be a police officer "all the time" and who needed strong supervision and clear boundaries regarding off-duty conduct.
---
## Recurring Pattern of Off-Duty Police Activity
The most significant theme throughout the report is a repeated pattern of Dugger engaging in law-enforcement-type activity while off duty.
Multiple supervisors reported that Dugger had been repeatedly:
* Mentored
* Coached
* Counseled
* Advised
not to take police action while off duty except in emergencies involving imminent bodily harm or death.
The report references numerous prior incidents, including:
* South St. Paul-related incident (Case 090122732)
* BB gun confrontation in St. Paul (Case 09016410)
* Additional incidents:
* 09023662
* 09025054
* 09026239
According to Commander Sommerhause, these incidents resulted in repeated counseling sessions where Dugger was instructed to:
> Call the local agency and be a good witness.
rather than personally intervening.
Sergeant Jay Maher described those counseling sessions as:
* Very clear
* Very direct
* Not ambiguous
regarding the expectation that Dugger should not perform law-enforcement duties while off duty unless someone's life was in danger.
---
## Supervisors Involved in Counseling Dugger
The report identifies several supervisors who repeatedly addressed Dugger's conduct:
### Commander Dale Sommerhause
Repeatedly coached Dugger regarding off-duty enforcement activity. Sommerhause stated Dugger often acknowledged the concerns and indicated he understood them.
### Commander Rich Clark
Clark stated he had at least three or four "heart-to-hearts" with Dugger regarding:
* Off-duty conduct
* Avoiding unnecessary police action
* Making it through probation without problems
Clark stated he felt some personal responsibility because he had supported Dugger's entry into the department.
### Sergeant Jay Maher
Participated in counseling sessions and confirmed that Dugger was repeatedly instructed not to engage in off-duty enforcement activity.
### Sergeant Pete Eastman
Referenced by both Dugger and Sommerhause as having counseled Dugger regarding prior incidents.
---
## March 21, 2011 Incident
The IA investigation stemmed from an off-duty traffic stop conducted by Dugger while driving home from work.
According to the report:
* Dugger was off duty.
* He used red and blue emergency lights installed in his personal vehicle.
* He stopped a motorist in Inver Grove Heights.
* He searched the vehicle.
* He issued citations.
* He told responding Inver Grove Heights officers he would handle the charges.
The incident generated concern from Inver Grove Heights officers and supervisors, ultimately leading to the Internal Affairs complaint.
---
## DVS Database Use
A major portion of the investigation examined Dugger's use of the Minnesota Driver and Vehicle Services (DVS) system.
The report states that since June 23, 2009:
* Dugger had performed nearly **2,000 documented DVS queries**.
Investigators concluded that many of these searches appeared unrelated to official duties.
Dugger admitted using DVS:
* At work
* At home
* On his mobile phone
The report states he searched:
* Prince (23 times)
* His own name (over 100 times)
* Family members
* Friends
* Coworkers
* Former coworkers
* His ex-wife
* Members of the public
Dugger acknowledged some of these searches were conducted simply to view photographs or satisfy personal curiosity.
---
## Dugger's Own Explanation
Throughout the report, Dugger consistently stated that:
* He believed he was trying to do the right thing.
* He was not intentionally violating policy.
* He was not attempting to hide his actions.
* He felt bad about the situation.
* He did not want to lose his job.
He repeatedly stated that if his actions violated policy, he would not repeat them.
---
## Investigative Conclusions
The investigator concluded that complaints of:
* Improper Conduct
* Improper Procedure
should both be **Sustained**.
The report states Dugger violated:
* Conduct Unbecoming a Peace Officer policies
* County personnel rules
* Computer-use policies
* DVS authorized-use rules
and cited both the off-duty enforcement activity and the DVS database use as central concerns.
---
## Overall Picture Presented by the Report
Viewed strictly through the lens of this IA report, Chris Dugger is portrayed as a deputy who:
* Entered law enforcement after years as a trusted informant.
* Was viewed by some supervisors as dedicated, hardworking, and serious about police work.
* Had not received patrol field training.
* Repeatedly sought to engage in police activity even when off duty.
* Was repeatedly counseled by supervisors regarding those tendencies.
* Continued engaging in similar behavior despite multiple warnings.
* Used the DVS database extensively for both work-related and personal purposes.
* Became the subject of a sustained Internal Affairs investigation in 2011 as a result.
That is the fullest career summary that can be derived from this report alone without bringing in any outside records, later disciplinary actions, court filings, POST records, or subsequent employment history.

Skip the Carousel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

1 week ago | [YT] | 1