If he was a “bully,” he would’ve stayed at one weight class draining himself to have size advantage. Instead, he kept moving up.
2. Opponents Said He Was Too Small for 147
When Crawford moved to welterweight in 2018, fighters openly doubted him:
Shawn Porter (2016 interview, before Crawford came up): “He’s not big enough for 147.”
Errol Spence Jr. once dismissed him as too small for him.
People are now crying “weight bully” and once laughed that he was too small, the narrative doesn’t hold.
3. His Opponents Were Bigger Weight-Cutters
Errol Spence Jr.: Known for huge rehydration at 147 — reported to rehydrate close to 160 lbs+ on fight night.
Kell Brook: Struggled badly to make 147, cutting extreme amounts of weight.
Shawn Porter: Fought as high as 165 in the amateurs, and was a strong, rehydrated welterweight.
Amir Khan: Started his career at lightweight but was known for being muscular and thick at 147.
4. His Dominance Comes from Skill, Not Size
Spence was the naturally bigger man, yet Crawford dismantled him technically.
Crawford’s adaptability (switch-hitting, timing, ring IQ) is what separates him, not pounds.
receipts backing my argument, with direct quotes and sources — perfect for turning the “weight bully” narrative on its head with evidence, not just opinions:
1. Crawford Himself Acknowledged Being the Smaller Man
He repeatedly admitted he entered the ring undersized, yet stronger:
> “I was always the smaller guy, even when I was fighting at 140 pounds... The bigger they are, the harder they fall.”
2. Opponents and Media Also Highlighted That He Was Seen as Too Small
After the Spence fight:
> “All you guys that said I was too small… I was actually too strong.”
3. Media & Analysts Voiced Concerns About His Size
Veteran trainer Abel Sanchez predicted that Spence’s size, youth, and frame would be a problem for Crawford:
> “Crawford looks like a pumped-up light welterweight who ate his way to 147. His frame doesn’t resemble a natural welterweight like Spence…”
Boxing analyst Paulie Malignaggi argued Spence’s natural size and physicality posed a challenge for the smaller Crawford:
> “I think Errol’s too big, and the natural size is going to be a bit too much for Terence to deal with.”
4. Not Just About Weight — His Dominance Was Skill-Based
In the Spence fight, statistics underscored Crawford’s technical superiority:
He landed 185 total punches vs. Spence’s 96.
Power punches: 98 landed by Crawford, 63 by Spence.
Those numbers show dominance driven by skill, not size or brute force.
This channel is rich REMINDER for a reason. Subscribe
Rich
🥊 Crawford Was Not a Weight Bully
1. He Started at Lightweight (135 lbs)
Pro debut in 2008 at 135.
Became undisputed at 140 before moving up.
If he was a “bully,” he would’ve stayed at one weight class draining himself to have size advantage. Instead, he kept moving up.
2. Opponents Said He Was Too Small for 147
When Crawford moved to welterweight in 2018, fighters openly doubted him:
Shawn Porter (2016 interview, before Crawford came up): “He’s not big enough for 147.”
Errol Spence Jr. once dismissed him as too small for him.
People are now crying “weight bully” and once laughed that he was too small, the narrative doesn’t hold.
3. His Opponents Were Bigger Weight-Cutters
Errol Spence Jr.: Known for huge rehydration at 147 — reported to rehydrate close to 160 lbs+ on fight night.
Kell Brook: Struggled badly to make 147, cutting extreme amounts of weight.
Shawn Porter: Fought as high as 165 in the amateurs, and was a strong, rehydrated welterweight.
Amir Khan: Started his career at lightweight but was known for being muscular and thick at 147.
4. His Dominance Comes from Skill, Not Size
Spence was the naturally bigger man, yet Crawford dismantled him technically.
Crawford’s adaptability (switch-hitting, timing, ring IQ) is what separates him, not pounds.
receipts backing my argument, with direct quotes and sources — perfect for turning the “weight bully” narrative on its head with evidence, not just opinions:
1. Crawford Himself Acknowledged Being the Smaller Man
He repeatedly admitted he entered the ring undersized, yet stronger:
> “I was always the smaller guy, even when I was fighting at 140 pounds... The bigger they are, the harder they fall.”
2. Opponents and Media Also Highlighted That He Was Seen as Too Small
After the Spence fight:
> “All you guys that said I was too small… I was actually too strong.”
3. Media & Analysts Voiced Concerns About His Size
Veteran trainer Abel Sanchez predicted that Spence’s size, youth, and frame would be a problem for Crawford:
> “Crawford looks like a pumped-up light welterweight who ate his way to 147. His frame doesn’t resemble a natural welterweight like Spence…”
Boxing analyst Paulie Malignaggi argued Spence’s natural size and physicality posed a challenge for the smaller Crawford:
> “I think Errol’s too big, and the natural size is going to be a bit too much for Terence to deal with.”
4. Not Just About Weight — His Dominance Was Skill-Based
In the Spence fight, statistics underscored Crawford’s technical superiority:
He landed 185 total punches vs. Spence’s 96.
Power punches: 98 landed by Crawford, 63 by Spence.
Those numbers show dominance driven by skill, not size or brute force.
This channel is rich REMINDER for a reason. Subscribe
8 months ago (edited) | [YT] | 0
View 19 replies